A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics
Open accessAbstract
Comparative genomics, whereby the genomes of different species are compared, has the potential to address broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution. However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests. Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses. This problem of non-independence may be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes but can be addressed by applying phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomic analyses. Here, we review how controlling for phylogeny can change the conclusions of comparative genomics studies. We address common questions on how to apply these methods and illustrate how they can be used to test causal hypotheses. The combination of rapidly expanding genomic datasets and phylogenetic comparative methods is set to revolutionize the biological insights possible from comparative genomic studies. Controlling for phylogeny is essential in comparative genomics studies, because species, genomes and genes are not independent data points within statistical tests. The authors review the application of phylogeny-based comparative methods to genomic data to control for non-independence and how to test for causal hypotheses.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Comparative genomics must account for phylogenetic non-independence because species, genomes and genes are not independent data points. Phylogeny-based comparative methods can change conclusions, reduce spurious results and help test causal hypotheses in genomic data.
Key findings
- Species, genomes and genes are not independent: closely related species share traits by common descent, and genes within genomes add further non-independence. The paper argues phylogeny-based methods are essential to avoid incorrect conclusions.
- Genomic databases are strongly biased: of 28,504 complete bacterial genomes in RefSeq and GTDB, 26% (7,376) come from 0.1% of species, while 73% of bacterial species have only one representative genome; in AllTheBacteria, the 10 most sequenced species make up 77% of 1.9 million genomes.
- Gene and genome data can be massive and non-independent: the paper notes 41 million genes across 1,800 eukaryote genomes in RefSeq, with genes per genome varying from 465 to 155,000.
- Statistical significance can mislead in large datasets: at n=10,000, a relationship explaining only 0.027% of variance would be significant at P<0.05; average variance explained in ecology and evolutionary biology is 3.6%, while successful areas such as sex ratios and cooperation explain 20–40%.
Methods
- Review article synthesizing phylogeny-based comparative methods for comparative genomics, with illustrative case studies and common questions.
- No new primary dataset or empirical analysis is presented; examples and numbers are drawn from cited studies and databases.
- Main analysis is conceptual: it summarizes phylogenetic regressions, phylogenetic mixed models, ancestral state reconstruction and phylogenetic path analysis, and discusses when and how to control for phylogeny.
Limitations
- The paper states that methods are still being developed and debated for some questions, and that lack of a good phylogeny can pose a problem.
- It states that phylogenetic uncertainty can affect results, that missing taxa cannot be accounted for, and that similarity-score approaches for mobile genetic elements and viruses remain tentative.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search protocol or meta-analysis, and its case studies are selected examples rather than a comprehensive quantitative synthesis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
62 of 123 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
The problem of species non-independence still arises when examining evolutionary labile traits that evolve very fast or are the product of very recent events.
“The problem of species non-independence still arises when examining evolutionary labile traits that evolve very fast or are the product of very recent events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [44] Revell, L. J. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 319–329 (2010). source
The Introduction says species are statistically non-independent because of shared history and explains that phylogenetic dependence in regression residuals can remain even when the traits themselves show very low phylogenetic signal. That supports the general caution, but the paper does not specifically establish it for rapidly evolving traits or traits produced by very recent events. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Losos, J. B. Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am. Nat. 177, 709–727 (2011). source
In “Many Traits in Many Clades Do Not Exhibit Phylogenetic Effect” (page unavailable), Losos says rapid evolutionary change can leave closely related species phenotypically dissimilar. The same section says that when a trait lacks phylogenetic effect, values in closely related species may be statistically independent—the contrary of the claim that non-independence still arises for such traits. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [55] Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003). source
- cites [56] Revell, L. J., Harmon, L. J. & Collar, D. C. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57, 591–601 (2008). source
The section “Phylogenetic Signal and Evolutionary Rate” (page unavailable) reports that, under unconstrained genetic drift, evolutionary rate has no relationship with phylogenetic signal. This supports the point that rapidly evolving traits cannot simply be assumed independent. But the paper does not establish that non-independence persists for traits produced by very recent events; its discussion of changes concentrated near the tree tips says they can reduce phylogenetic signal, and its introductory passage cautions against assuming dependence without estimating it. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Across all genomes in the newly curated AllTheBacteria database, the 10 most sequenced species make up 77% of the 1.9 million genomes.
“Across all genomes in the newly curated AllTheBacteria database, the 10 most sequenced species make up 77% of the 1.9 million genomes5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Hunt, M., Lima, L., Shen, W., Lees, J. & Iqbal, Z. AllTheBacteria — all bacterial genomes assembled, available and searchable. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.584059 (2024). source
The section “A community-built atlas of bacterial and archaeal genomes” reports 2,440,377 genomes in the current release, contrary to the claimed total of 1.9 million. It notes a bias toward frequently sequenced organisms but does not give the claimed 77% share for the ten most sequenced species. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The problem of non-independence can be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes.
“This problem of non-independence can be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes.”
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
“In genomic datasets, data points can correspond to genomes or even individual genes, meaning the problem of species not being independent can be exacerbated by additional levels of non-independence, including genes within genomes, such as those carried on the same replicon, and genomes of the same or closely related species16,19,21–26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 8 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [21] Hardison, R. C. Comparative genomics. PLoS Biol. 1, e58 (2003). source
The Abstract discusses comparing genomes at different phylogenetic distances, and Prospects notes that related species retain features from a common ancestor. Neither passage addresses whether a problem of non-independence is exacerbated when examining genomes or genes; searches for non-independence and independent observations found no passage making that point. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Dewar, A. E. et al. Plasmids do not consistently stabilize cooperation across bacteria but may promote broad pathogen host-range. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1624–1636 (2021). This study used phylogenetic comparative methods and evolutionary theory to test the hypothesis that genes for cooperative traits should be overrepresented on plasmids. source
- cites [23] Dewar, A. E., Belcher, L. J., Scott, T. W. & West, S. A. Genes for cooperation are not more likely to be carried by plasmids. Proc. R. Soc. B 291, 20232549 (2024). source
- cites [24] Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320170121 (2024). This study used phylogeny-based causal inference methods to identify bacterial lifestyle as the key factor shaping variation in pangenome structure across species. source
The Abstract says that species and genomes can share characteristics through common descent and therefore cannot always be treated as independent data points. It does not say that non-independence is exacerbated when examining genomes or genes, or make that comparison explicitly. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Bouvier, J. W. & Kelly, S. Response to Tcherkez and Farquhar: rubisco adaptation is more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by catalytic trade-off. J. Plant. Physiol. 287, 154021 (2023). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says shared ancestry makes biological data points non-independent and suggests that cellular or molecular datasets may be affected by phylogenetic signal. It does not say the problem is exacerbated when examining genomes or genes, or compare its severity with other kinds of data. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [26] Bouvier, J. W. et al. Rubisco adaptation is more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by catalytic trade-off. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 2880–2896 (2021). This study showed that molecular evolution of the enzyme rubisco is mostly influenced by phylogenetic history, contrary to previous work proposing a key role of catalytic trade-offs. source
The Introduction explains that rubisco genes share ancestry, making measurements from closely related species non-independent. The Results confirm this for carboxylase-related kinetic traits in angiosperms, but the paper does not establish that non-independence is generally exacerbated when examining genomes or genes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
The problem of non-independence is complicated even further by how unrepresentative most genomic datasets are of natural communities, owing to biases in which species have been sequenced more frequently.
“The problem of non-independence is complicated even further by how unrepresentative most genomic datasets are of natural communities, owing to biases in which species have been sequenced more frequently (Fig. 2)27–29.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Blackwell, G. A. et al. Exploring bacterial diversity via a curated and searchable snapshot of archived DNA sequences. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001421 (2021). source
The Abstract reports a strongly uneven species composition in the ENA/public bacterial genome databases: 20 of 2,336 species account for 90% of the genomes. The Discussion links this skew to sequencing priorities and says the archive does not capture bacterial diversity well. The paper does not establish that most genomic datasets, beyond the bacterial archives it examines, are unrepresentative of natural communities. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] Feng, S. et al. Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics. Nature 587, 252–257 (2020). source
The Abstract says sparse taxon sampling captures only a fraction of genomic diversity, supporting the concern that genomic datasets can be unrepresentative. It does not establish that most datasets are unrepresentative of natural communities because some species are sequenced more frequently, or explain how that bias compounds non-independence. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Upham, N. S. & Landis, M. J. Genomics expands the mammalverse. Science 380, 358–359 (2023). In a collection of papers, phylogenomics was used to analyse the Zoonomia Consortium’s collection of genomes of 240 diverse mammal species. source
In “Genomics expands the mammalverse” (page not provided), the paper reports that available mammal genomes disproportionately represent large-bodied and high-latitude species, and warns that sampling biases can limit the generalizability of evolutionary inferences. It does not establish that most genomic datasets are unrepresentative of natural communities or explain how this compounds non-independence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
The problem of species not being independent can be exacerbated by additional levels of non-independence, including genes within genomes and genomes of the same or closely related species.
“In genomic datasets, data points can correspond to genomes or even individual genes, meaning the problem of species not being independent can be exacerbated by additional levels of non-independence, including genes within genomes, such as those carried on the same replicon, and genomes of the same or closely related species16,19,21–26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 8 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [21] Hardison, R. C. Comparative genomics. PLoS Biol. 1, e58 (2003). source
The Abstract discusses comparisons between genomes at different phylogenetic distances, and the Prospects section defines relationships among homologous genes. Neither passage addresses statistical non-independence among species, genes within a genome, or genomes of closely related species. Searches for non-independence and independent phylogenetic comparisons found no passage making that point; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Dewar, A. E. et al. Plasmids do not consistently stabilize cooperation across bacteria but may promote broad pathogen host-range. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1624–1636 (2021). This study used phylogenetic comparative methods and evolutionary theory to test the hypothesis that genes for cooperative traits should be overrepresented on plasmids. source
- cites [23] Dewar, A. E., Belcher, L. J., Scott, T. W. & West, S. A. Genes for cooperation are not more likely to be carried by plasmids. Proc. R. Soc. B 291, 20232549 (2024). source
The Methods (Data and statistical analyses; page unavailable) warn against grouping genes from multiple genomes or species, use genomes as data points, and account for species and phylogenetic similarity. This supports non-independence across genomes of the same or related species, but the paper does not specifically identify genes on the same replicon as an additional source of non-independence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320170121 (2024). This study used phylogeny-based causal inference methods to identify bacterial lifestyle as the key factor shaping variation in pangenome structure across species. source
The Abstract (page unavailable) says that species and genomes can share characteristics through common descent and that species cannot be treated as independent data points. This supports non-independence among related species and genomes, but our copy does not address non-independence of genes within a genome or genes carried on the same replicon. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Bouvier, J. W. & Kelly, S. Response to Tcherkez and Farquhar: rubisco adaptation is more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by catalytic trade-off. J. Plant. Physiol. 287, 154021 (2023). source
The Introduction and the section headed “Phylogenetic non-independence” say that shared ancestry makes species-level observations non-independent. Our copy does not address the additional dependence claimed for genes within a genome, genes on the same replicon, or multiple genomes from the same species. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [26] Bouvier, J. W. et al. Rubisco adaptation is more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by catalytic trade-off. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 2880–2896 (2021). This study showed that molecular evolution of the enzyme rubisco is mostly influenced by phylogenetic history, contrary to previous work proposing a key role of catalytic trade-offs. source
The Introduction explains that Rubisco measurements from closely related species are non-independent because of shared ancestry. The paper does not address the claimed additional levels of non-independence among genes within a genome or among multiple genomes of the same species; the Materials and Methods discuss species-level phylogenetic correction instead. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Even a slight lack of independence can lead to bias in statistical analyses and incorrect conclusions.
“Even a slight lack of independence can lead to bias in statistical analyses and incorrect conclusions13–15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Kruskal, W. Miracles and statistics: the casual assumption of independence. Null 83, 929–940 (1988).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14] Ives, A. R. & Zhu, J. Statistics for correlated data: phylogenies, space, and time. Ecol. Appl. 16, 20–32 (2006). source
- cites [15] Whitney, K. D. & Garland, T. Jr. Did genetic drift drive increases in genome complexity? PLoS Genet. 6, e1001080 (2010). This study re-analysed data on genome size and effective population size while controlling for phylogeny and found no evidence of previously identified correlations, which suggests that these were an artefact of phylogenetic non-independence. source
The Introduction says that shared phylogenetic history can violate statistical independence and that nonphylogenetic analyses frequently overestimate associations. Its Figure 1 illustrates an incorrect conclusion, but the paper does not establish that even a slight lack of independence is enough to produce bias or an incorrect conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Comparative genomic analyses usually test for correlations between traits.
“Comparative genomic analyses usually test for correlations between traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim8 of 10 sources checked- cites [37] Murray, G. G. R. et al. Genome reduction is associated with bacterial pathogenicity across different scales of temporal and ecological divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 1570–1579 (2021). This study used the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts to examine how genome size is correlated with pathogenicity across bacteria. source
The Results and Discussion section (‘Pathogenicity Is Associated with Genome Reduction at All Divergence Scales’; page unavailable) reports associations between genomic traits and pathogenicity, and the Statistical Analyses section describes tests of those associations. This supports the paper as an example of comparative genomic analysis testing trait associations, but it does not establish that such analyses usually do so. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [67] de Albuquerque, N. R. M. et al. A new microsporidian parasite, Ordospora pajunii sp. nov. (Ordosporidae), of Daphnia longispina highlights the value of genomic data for delineating species boundaries. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 69, e12902 (2022). source
- cites [75] Grafen, A. & Hails, R. Modern Statistics for the Life Sciences (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [76] Zoonomia Consortium. A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation. Nature 587, 240–245 (2020). source
The Genetic diversity and extinction risk section tests correlations between genomic diversity measures and species-level traits; Next steps also proposes genotype–phenotype correlations. Neither passage says comparative genomic analyses usually test correlations between traits themselves. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [77] Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550, 61–66 (2017). source
The Methods section, “Association testing between microbiome features and phenotypic covariates” (page unavailable), describes testing associations between microbial or pathway abundances and subject metadata. This supports the idea that the paper tests associations, but it does not establish that comparative genomic analyses usually test correlations between traits. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [78] Duarte, C. M. et al. Sequencing effort dictates gene discovery in marine microbial metagenomes. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 4589–4603 (2020). source
The Results section ('Gene discovery across marine and host-associated metagenomes'; page unavailable) compares metagenomic gene catalogues to examine sequencing effort and gene discovery. Searches for comparative genomics and trait correlations found no passage in our copy addressing what comparative genomic analyses usually test. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [79] Arikawa, K. & Hosokawa, M. Uncultured prokaryotic genomes in the spotlight: an examination of publicly available data from metagenomics and single-cell genomics. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 4508–4518 (2023). source
The sections on genetic diversity and prokaryotic genes compare genome datasets, but do not describe what comparative genomic analyses usually test. Searches for trait correlations and associations between genomic features found no passage addressing that claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [80] Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737–746 (2021). source
The Methods > Curation passage describes comparative genomics used to check assembly structure, while Fig. 2 reports correlations among genome and assembly measures. Neither passage says that comparative genomic analyses usually test correlations between traits; searches for that formulation and for trait or phenotype correlations found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [81] Blommaert, J. Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20201441 (2020). source
Section 3, “Potential model organisms for genome size evolution” (page unavailable), says that studies of genome-size evolution often use correlations between genome size and other traits or statistics. It does not establish that comparative genomic analyses generally—beyond this research area—usually test correlations between traits. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [82] Garcia-Garcera, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. Community diversity and habitat structure shape the repertoire of extracellular proteins in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 11, 758 (2020). source
The Methods (Statistical analyses; page not provided) describe correlation tests, and the Results (High habitat structure favors extracellular proteins; page not provided) report a correlation between protein-gene frequency and habitat structure. This supports the paper as an example of a genomic analysis testing an association, but it does not establish that comparative genomic analyses usually do so. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Analysing genes or genomes as if they were independent data points can be equivalent to having more technical (pseudo) replicates in an experiment, but then treating each as if they were a truly independent sample (biological replicate).
“Analysing genes or genomes as if they were independent data points can be equivalent to having more technical (pseudo) replicates in an experiment, but then treating each as if they were a truly independent sample (biological replicate)22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Dewar, A. E. et al. Plasmids do not consistently stabilize cooperation across bacteria but may promote broad pathogen host-range. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1624–1636 (2021). This study used phylogenetic comparative methods and evolutionary theory to test the hypothesis that genes for cooperative traits should be overrepresented on plasmids. source
- Premisecitation
Considering the fields of ecology and evolutionary biology, the average % of variance explained in an analysis is 3.6%.
“Considering the fields of ecology and evolutionary biology, the average % of variance explained in an analysis is 3.6%123.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] Gupta, A., Kapil, R., Dhakan, D. B. & Sharma, V. K. MP3: a software tool for the prediction of pathogenic proteins in genomic and metagenomic data. PLoS ONE 9, e93907 (2014). source
The Results and Discussions sections report prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and MCC for pathogenic-protein classifiers, not variance explained across ecology and evolutionary biology analyses. Searches for the claimed 3.6% average and for variance explained in those fields found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Controlling for confounding variables such as phylogeny does not reduce statistical power.
“Controlling for confounding variables such as phylogeny does not reduce statistical power, because such variables should be accounted for before making any estimates of power18,114,115.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [114] Whelan, F. J., Rusilowicz, M. & McInerney, J. O. Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes. Microb. Genom. 6, e000338 (2020). source
The Theory and implementation section describes how Coinfinder assesses phylogenetic lineage-dependence, but does not compare statistical power with and without that assessment. The Results section discusses how Coinfinder’s power varies with dataset size and gene diversity, not whether controlling for phylogeny reduces power or should precede power estimates. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [115] Pond, S. L. K., Frost, S. D. W. & Muse, S. V. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21, 676–679 (2005). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes HyPhy as a platform for likelihood-based analyses of sequence alignments, and §2.1.1 describes model fitting and parameter-estimation variability. Neither addresses whether controlling for phylogeny affects statistical power or whether confounders should be accounted for before estimating power; searches for those points found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There is also a bias towards bacterial genomes relative to eukaryotes.
“More broadly, there is also a bias towards bacterial genomes relative to eukaryotes3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–D745 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
More recently developed methods allow analyses to go further and test competing causal hypotheses.
“More recently developed methods allow analyses to go further and test competing causal hypotheses42,84.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
- cites [84] Shaw, L. P., Rocha, E. P. C. & MacLean, R. C. Restriction-modification systems have shaped the evolution and distribution of plasmids across bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 6806–6818 (2023). This phylogenetically controlled analysis of a large plasmid dataset showed that the presence of mechanisms that defend bacteria against mobile genetic elements have influenced how plasmids are distributed across bacteria. source
The Materials and Methods sections describe a developed pipeline for predicting R-M targets, a sequence-composition null model, and phylogenetically controlled analyses. These methods support the point that analyses can go further, but the paper does not present them as a general advance for testing competing causal hypotheses. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Genomic databases are biased towards taxonomic groups that have been sequenced more frequently.
“This problem is made worse because genomic databases are biased towards taxonomic groups that have been sequenced more frequently27–29 (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Blackwell, G. A. et al. Exploring bacterial diversity via a curated and searchable snapshot of archived DNA sequences. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001421 (2021). source
- cites [28] Feng, S. et al. Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics. Nature 587, 252–257 (2020). source
The Abstract (page not provided) says sparse taxon sampling captures only a fraction of genomic diversity, and the Methods describe adding 267 newly sequenced bird genomes to 96 publicly available ones. This supports a concern about limited taxonomic representation, but the paper does not establish the broader claim that genomic databases are biased toward taxonomic groups sequenced more frequently. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Upham, N. S. & Landis, M. J. Genomics expands the mammalverse. Science 380, 358–359 (2023). In a collection of papers, phylogenomics was used to analyse the Zoonomia Consortium’s collection of genomes of 240 diverse mammal species. source
- Interpretationcitation
Very large datasets will almost always produce significant P-values, even if the estimated effect size is relatively small.
“Hence, in the extreme, very large datasets will almost always produce significant P-values, even if the estimated effect size is relatively small122 (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R. & Pennell, M. W. Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 67, 1091–1109 (2018). source
Case Study I reports significant regressions driven by a single phylogenetic shift, with significance increasing as the size of that shift increases. It does not say that very large datasets almost always yield significant P-values despite small estimated effects. Searches for sample size, P-values, and effect size did not find that relationship in our copy; the supplied passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Testing whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link.
“To distinguish which scenario is more likely, we could test whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait, which would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link42,43,51,85–87 (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 6 sources checked- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
- cites [43] Revell, L. J. & Harmon, L. J. Phylogenetic Comparative Methods in R (Princeton Univ. Press, 2022). A very useful book providing a detailed guide for analysing data using phylogenetic comparative methods in the R programming language.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Pagel, M. & Meade, A. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible‐jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167, 808–825 (2006). source
- cites [85] Hall, R. J. et al. Gene-gene relationships in an Escherichia coli accessory genome are linked to function and mobility. Microb. Genom. 7, 000650 (2021). source
The Introduction discusses gene dependencies, and the Discussion reports repeated gene co-occurrence and avoidance in E. coli. Neither passage addresses testing the order of ancestral trait changes or whether a consistent sequence would indicate a causal link. Searches for ancestral changes, temporal order, and causal relationships found no passage making that point. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [86] Whelan, F. J., Hall, R. J. & McInerney, J. O. Evidence for selection in the abundant accessory gene content of a prokaryote pangenome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3697–3708 (2021). source
The Methods section describes testing gene-pair presence and absence patterns, not whether ancestral changes in one trait are consistently followed by changes in another. The Discussion says this method misses asymmetrical dependencies and calls for further investigation of direct interactions, but does not propose the claimed ancestral-change test or say that its result would suggest a causal link (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [87] Hu, E.-Z., Lan, X.-R., Liu, Z.-L., Gao, J. & Niu, D.-K. A positive correlation between GC content and growth temperature in prokaryotes. BMC Genom. 23, 110 (2022). source
The Results section ('Evolutionary jumps in bacterial GC contents are correlated with Topt changes'; page not provided) reports that changes in growth temperature and GC content tend to occur in the same direction. The Discussion cautions that not all increases coincide and describes the finding as a statistical correlation. The paper supports testing for coordinated trait changes, but does not say that such a result would suggest a causal link. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Although a phylogeny has been used during the collection of data, it is still important to control for any phylogenetic non-independence when analysing those data across genes, genomes and species.
“Although a phylogeny has been used during the collection of such data, it is still important to control for any phylogenetic non-independence when analysing those data across genes, genomes and species93.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] Boyko, J. D. & Beaulieu, J. M. Generalized hidden Markov models for phylogenetic comparative datasets. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 468–478 (2021). source
The Worked example and methods (§2.3.2; page unavailable) uses a phylogeny to analyse traits across angiosperm species, supporting the general relevance of phylogenetic analysis. But the paper does not say that using a phylogeny during data collection leaves phylogenetic non-independence to be controlled during analysis, or address that point across genes and genomes. Its discussion of correlated traits (§4) concerns a different kind of dependence. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank does not remove the problem of non-independence between the ranks.
“Grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank does not remove the problem of non-independence between the ranks19,104.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [104] Gavriilidou, A. et al. Goldfinder: unraveling networks of gene co-occurrence and avoidance in bacterial pangenomes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.591652 (2024). source
The available Abstract discusses phylogenetic dependencies in gene co-occurrence analyses, but it does not address grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank or whether that grouping resolves non-independence. Searches for those terms and a paraphrase returned no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
A lack of variation in a potential explanatory variable (X), while the response variable (Y) does vary, is an important result, not a failing of the dataset.
“A lack of variation in a potential explanatory variable (X), while the response variable (Y) does vary, is an important result, not a failing of the dataset24.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320170121 (2024). This study used phylogeny-based causal inference methods to identify bacterial lifestyle as the key factor shaping variation in pangenome structure across species. source
The Results section, “Variation across Host-Associated Species” (page unavailable), reports substantial variation in pangenome fluidity and finds that varying lifestyle traits explain some of it. I searched for a lack of variation in an explanatory variable and for whether that would be an important result rather than a dataset failing; no passage in our copy addresses that methodological claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The level of significance (the size of a P-value) will depend on the size of the effect and the number of data points, tested against a null hypothesis of exactly zero difference, or exactly zero correlation.
“Usually, the level of significance (the size of a P-value) will depend on the size of the effect and the number of data points, tested against a null hypothesis of exactly zero difference, or exactly zero correlation119–121.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [119] Maddison, W. P. & FitzJohn, R. G. The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters. Syst. Biol. 64, 127–136 (2015). source
- cites [120] Kyriacou, R. G., Mulhair, P. O. & Holland, P. W. H. GC content across insect genomes: phylogenetic patterns, causes and consequences. J. Mol. Evol. 92, 138–152 (2024). source
The Methods section, “Relation Between GC Content and Chromosome Size” (page unavailable), describes a comparison with a model that forces correlation to zero; the Results section reports significant Pearson correlations using P < 0.05 (page unavailable). The paper does not state that P-value size depends on effect size and the number of data points, and its explicit zero-correlation model is compared using Bayes factors, not P-values. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [121] Boettiger, C., Coop, G. & Ralph, P. Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution 66, 2240–2251 (2012). source
Methods §2.3 defines a p-value by comparing an observed likelihood difference with its distribution under a null model. Results §4.4 and §5 show that the ability to detect selection depends on its strength and on phylogeny size. The paper does not establish the broader claim that p-values generally depend on the number of data points or that the null is always exactly zero difference or zero correlation; its null is a specified comparative model. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Particularly successful areas, such as the evolution of sex ratios and cooperation, have produced comparative studies that can explain 20-40% of the variation in data across species.
“Particularly successful areas, such as the evolution of sex ratios and cooperation, have produced comparative studies that can explain 20–40% of the variation in data across species124,125.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [124] Belcher, L. J. et al. SOCfinder: a genomic tool for identifying social genes in bacteria. Microb. Genom. 9, 001171 (2023). source
The Introduction discusses comparing cooperative genes across species, and the Results describe an analysis of genomes from 47 bacterial species. Neither passage says that comparative studies of cooperation or sex ratios explain 20–40% of variation across species. Searches for that figure and for sex-ratio comparative studies found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [125] Belcher, L. J., Dewar, A. E., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Kin selection for cooperation in natural bacterial populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119070119 (2022). source
The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that comparative studies across species found higher cooperation where relatedness is higher. The paper does not report that such studies explain 20–40% of variation across species, and it does not substantiate that figure for sex ratios; searches for the percentage, explained variation, and sex-ratio comparative studies found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Similar problems, and a need for phylogenetic methods, arise when using data from other omic methods, such as transcriptomics, metagenomics or metabolomics.
“Similar problems, and a need for phylogenetic methods, arise when using data from other omic methods, such as transcriptomics, metagenomics or metabolomics61–64.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [61] Symonds, M. R. E. & Blomberg, S. P. in Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z.) Ch. 5, 105–130 (Springer, 2014). source
- cites [62] Wyatt, C. D. R. et al. Social complexity, life-history and lineage influence the molecular basis of castes in vespid wasps. Nat. Commun. 14, 1046 (2023). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says that lineage influences the molecular toolkit identified from gene-expression data and highlights the importance of considering lineage. The Methods describe phylogenetic analyses of the wasp species. This supports the transcriptomics example, but the paper does not address metagenomics or metabolomics or establish a need for phylogenetic methods across those omics. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [63] Raulo, A. et al. Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 972–985 (2024). source
Methods (Statistical analyses; page not provided) says the authors accounted for phylogenetic non-independence among bacterial genera, supporting the need for a phylogenetic approach in this microbiota analysis. Methods (Microbiota profiling; page not provided) describes 16S rRNA sequencing, not transcriptomics, metagenomics or metabolomics; the paper does not establish the claimed need across those methods. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [64] Ghoul, M., Andersen, S. B. & West, S. A. Sociomics: using omic approaches to understand social evolution. Trends Genet. 33, 408–419 (2017). source
The paper identifies interpretive challenges for omic data in “Challenges to the interpretation of omic data” (p. 13), and “Concluding Remarks” (p. 10) asks whether omic signatures show patterns across phylogenies. “Statistical power in comparative studies” (p. 13) discusses phylogenetically independent transitions, but only for comparative genomic analyses; it does not establish a general need for phylogenetic methods when analysing transcriptomic, metagenomic, or metabolomic data. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingnone given
At n=10,000, a relationship explaining only 0.027% of the variance would be significant to P<0.05.
“At n=10,000, a relationship explaining only 0.027% of the variance would be significant to P<0.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
73% of bacterial species have only one representative genome in the databases.
“By contrast, 73% of bacterial species have only one representative genome in the databases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of 28,504 complete bacterial genomes in both the RefSeq and Genome Taxonomy Databases, 26% (7,376) are from 0.1% of species.
“For example, of 28,504 complete bacterial genomes in both the RefSeq and Genome Taxonomy Databases, 26% (7,376) are from 0.1% of species (Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In Fig. 4, even for the very small P-value of P=1x10-4, datasets of ~350 data points or more will produce significant results when the R2 value of the effect is less than 5%.
“To consider a specific case, in Fig. 4, even for the very small P-value of P=1x10-4, datasets of ~350 data points or more will produce significant results when the R2 value of the effect is less than 5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The application of phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomics can address the problem of non-independence.
“The application of phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomics can address this problem.”
- Also stated in: § [H1] Control for phylogenetic relationships · plain
“The problem of species’ non-independence can be solved by taking the evolutionary history of species into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § [H1] Control for phylogenetic relationships · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
The problem of species' non-independence can be solved by taking the evolutionary history of species into account.
“The problem of species’ non-independence can be solved by taking the evolutionary history of species into account.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent.
“Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses.”
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
“Closely related species tend to be similar because they share traits by common descent rather than through independent evolution (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [17] Harvey, P. H. & Purvis, A. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351, 619–624 (1991). source
- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
The fact that species cannot be considered independent data points was first recognized in the 1970s by evolutionary biologists studying the evolution of life history traits such as sexual dimorphism and home range in primates.
“The fact that species cannot be considered independent data points was first recognized in the 1970s by evolutionary biologists studying the evolution of life history traits such as sexual dimorphism and home range in primates16,18,30–32.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [30] Clutton‐Brock, T. H. & Harvey, P. H. Primate ecology and social organization. J. Zool. 183, 1–39 (1977). source
- cites [31] Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Harvey, P. H. Comparison and adaptation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205, 547–565 (1979). source
- cites [32] Ridley, M. The Explanation of Organic Diversity: The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating (Clarendon Press, 1983).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Species, genomes, and genes cannot be considered independent data points within statistical tests.
“However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests.”
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
“A problem for biologists wanting to conduct any form of across-species comparative analyses is that species do not represent independent data points16–20 (Fig. 1a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [17] Harvey, P. H. & Purvis, A. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351, 619–624 (1991). source
- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- Also stated in: § [H1] Introduction · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
Prioritizing the ability to produce significant results ahead of controlling for potential confounding variables can lead to incorrect conclusions not actually supported by the data.
“The general point here is that prioritizing the ability to produce significant results ahead of controlling for potential confounding variables can lead to incorrect conclusions not actually supported by the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Controlling for phylogeny can reduce the chance of detecting a significant result that is not real (Type II error or 'false positive').
“Instead, controlling for phylogeny can reduce the chance of detecting a significant result that is not real (Type II error or ‘false positive’)18,42.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
- Interpretationcitation
Collecting many more data points from the same phylogenetic cluster could increase any bias due to phylogenetic non-independence.
“Collecting many more data points from the same phylogenetic cluster could increase any bias due to phylogenetic non-independence (Fig. 1)16,18,20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- Interpretationreasoning
A result can be statistically significant even when it is unlikely to be biologically important.
“A result can be statistically significant even when it is unlikely to be biologically important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If all genomes were used as independent data points, this would increase the bias towards species that have been sequenced the most.
“If all genomes were used as independent data points, this would increase the bias towards species that have been sequenced the most.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If phylogeny is not controlled for, then increasing the number of data points in this way could make obtaining a spurious result more likely.
“If phylogeny is not controlled for, then increasing the number of data points in this way could make obtaining an spurious result more likely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Statistical significance does not necessarily reflect biological importance.
“Statistical significance does not necessarily reflect biological importance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The problem of non-independence is not solved by alternative methods such as grouping data by a higher taxonomic rank or by downsampling.
“The problem of non-independence is not solved by alternative methods such as grouping data by a higher taxonomic rank (for example, genera or family), or by sampling the same number of genomes from taxonomic groups to minimize oversampling (‘downsampling’)102,103.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [102] Eastman, J. M., Alfaro, M. E., Joyce, P., Hipp, A. L. & Harmon, L. J. A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees. Evolution 65, 3578–3589 (2011). source
- cites [103] Garamszegi, L. Z. (ed.) Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (Springer, 2014). source
- Interpretationcitation
There is no simple and robust alternative to controlling for phylogeny.
“There is no simple and robust alternative to controlling for phylogeny, and consequently, the best effort possible must be made to take phylogeny into account, to be able to detect real effects and avoid false positives.”
- Also stated in: § [H2] Do we always need to control for phylogeny? · boosted
““Phylogenies are fundamental to comparative biology; there is no doing it without taking them into account.”18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- Also stated in: § [H2] Do we always need to control for phylogeny? · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning
Phylogenetic comparative analyses provide a method to control for spurious results that could arise due to even unknown variables.
“Phylogenetic comparative analyses provide a method to control for spurious results that could arise due to even unknown variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is only possible to control for biases in representation of taxa currently present in a dataset.
“It is, however, only possible to control for biases in representation of taxa currently present in a dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In terms of sampling bias, phylogenetic methods will control for when taxa are overrepresented, so that better sampled taxa will not have a disproportionately large influence on analyses.
“In terms of sampling bias, phylogenetic methods will control for when taxa are overrepresented, so that better sampled taxa will not have a disproportionately large influence on analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Closely related species share many features of their ecology and life history.
“Closely related species share many features of their ecology and life history.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Phylogenetic analyses could also make it more likely to detect a real effect, by controlling for a confounding variable.
“Phylogenetic analyses could also make it more likely to detect a real effect, by controlling for a confounding variable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There are cases where the lack of a good phylogeny will pose a problem.
“there are cases where the lack of a good phylogeny will pose a problem112”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Pagel, M. D. & Harvey, P. H. Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 413–440 (1988). source
- Interpretationreasoning
If a response variable (Y) shows considerable variation across species, but a possible explanatory variable (X) does not vary appreciably across species, then variation in Y is not explained by variation in X.
“On the other hand, if we were interested in what explains variation in Y, it is clear that variation in Y is not explained by variation in X.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
There is an almost unlimited number of unknown 'third' variables which might influence the trait of interest.
“Consequently, there is an almost unlimited number of unknown ‘third’ variables which might influence the trait of interest20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Even if a response variable shows low (or no) phylogenetic signal, an explanatory variable, known or unknown, could still be correlated with phylogeny.
“Even if a response variable shows low (or no) phylogenetic signal, an explanatory variable, known or unknown, could still be correlated with phylogeny.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
- May combine two claims. 10
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpecies of snapping shrimp that are more social tend to have larger genomes with more transposable elements; a phylogenetic path analysis and ancestral state reconstruction supported the hypothesis that the acquisition of more transposable elements leads to both larger genome size and higher rates of sociality.
“For example, species of snapping shrimp that are more social tend to have larger genomes with more transposable elements; a phylogenetic path analysis and ancestral state reconstruction supported the hypothesis that the acquisition of more transposable elements leads to both larger genome size and higher rates of sociality68.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345, 1251788 (2014). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA total lack of phylogenetic signal is at one end of a spectrum and not a reason not to avoid phylogenetic comparative methods.
“A total lack of phylogenetic signal is at one end of a spectrum and not a reason not to avoid phylogenetic comparative methods44,54–56.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [44] Revell, L. J. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 319–329 (2010). source
- cites [54] Losos, J. B. Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am. Nat. 177, 709–727 (2011). source
- cites [55] Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003). source
- cites [56] Revell, L. J., Harmon, L. J. & Collar, D. C. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57, 591–601 (2008). source
The Abstract (page unavailable) treats phylogenetic signal as a measure of statistical dependence that can be weak, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) recommend fitting evolutionary models to the data and tree rather than inferring process from signal alone. These passages support treating signal as variable, but they do not explicitly say that a total lack of signal is one end of a spectrum or give a rule about whether to avoid phylogenetic comparative methods when signal is absent. The citing sentence also contains a double negative ('not a reason not to avoid'), so its intended methodological advice is unclear. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCorrelational results from observational data do not prove causation, but correlations can be used within comparative analyses to test causal hypotheses and examine evidence for causality.
“A general point here is that correlational results from observational data do not prove causation, but correlations can be used within comparative analyses to test causal hypotheses and examine evidence for causality42,90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
- cites [90] Rendueles, O., Garcia-Garcerà, M., Néron, B., Touchon, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. Abundance and co-occurrence of extracellular capsules increase environmental breadth: implications for the emergence of pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006525 (2017). source
The Results section on capsule co-occurrence and the Methods section on phylogenetic controls show the authors using comparative associations to test hypotheses. The Discussion says their results are “not consistent with the idea that capsules evolved to facilitate pathogenesis.” The paper thus supports using correlations to assess a causal hypothesis, but the passages do not state the broader methodological point that observational correlations cannot prove causation. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCausal inference methods such as phylogenetic path analysis could be used to test causal hypotheses.
“In this case, causal inference methods such as phylogenetic path analysis could be used to test causal hypotheses84,88,89.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [84] Shaw, L. P., Rocha, E. P. C. & MacLean, R. C. Restriction-modification systems have shaped the evolution and distribution of plasmids across bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 6806–6818 (2023). This phylogenetically controlled analysis of a large plasmid dataset showed that the presence of mechanisms that defend bacteria against mobile genetic elements have influenced how plasmids are distributed across bacteria. source
The Materials and Methods section, “Modelling palindrome avoidance controlling for phylogeny” (page unavailable), describes a phylogenetically controlled model of R-M target avoidance. It does not discuss phylogenetic path analysis or propose causal-inference methods for testing causal hypotheses. Searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [88] Haudiquet, M. et al. Capsules and their traits shape phage susceptibility and plasmid conjugation efficiency. Nat. Commun. 15, 2032 (2024). source
The Methods sections on Phylogenetic inference and Statistics and reproducibility describe tree construction and phylogenetic analyses, but do not discuss phylogenetic path analysis as a way to test causal hypotheses. Searches for “phylogenetic path analysis” and causal-inference terminology found no passage addressing that point. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [89] Rendueles, O., de Sousa, J. A. M., Bernheim, A., Touchon, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. Genetic exchanges are more frequent in bacteria encoding capsules. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007862 (2018). source
The Discussion proposes alternative causal explanations for the association between capsules and genetic exchange. However, neither it nor the Methods passages found when searching for phylogenetic path analysis and causal inference say that path analysis could be used to test causal hypotheses. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBacterial species with more fluid pangenomes have both more variable lifestyles and larger effective population sizes; a phylogenetic path analysis supported the hypothesis that this was due to lifestyle traits together influencing gene gain and loss, and that effective population size did not have a casual influence on pangenome fluidity.
“As another example, bacterial species with more fluid pangenomes have both more variable lifestyles and larger effective population sizes; a phylogenetic path analysis supported the hypothesis that this was due to lifestyle traits together influencing gene gain and loss, and that effective population size did not have a casual influence on pangenome fluidity24.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320170121 (2024). This study used phylogeny-based causal inference methods to identify bacterial lifestyle as the key factor shaping variation in pangenome structure across species. source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIn cases where complications arise, analysing the data with multiple methods can test the robustness of conclusions.
“In cases where complications arise it can be extremely useful to analyse the data with multiple methods to test the robustness of conclusions24,126.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M. & West, S. A. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320170121 (2024). This study used phylogeny-based causal inference methods to identify bacterial lifestyle as the key factor shaping variation in pangenome structure across species. source
- cites [126] Szucs, D. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: a reassessment. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 390 (2017). source
In “NHST may foster selective reporting and subjectivity” (page unavailable), the paper says different analytical choices can produce a range of results, including opposite effects. “Ways to change” (page unavailable) warns that small changes in analysis settings can alter statistical outcomes. These passages support checking whether conclusions depend on analytical choices, but the paper does not specifically recommend analysing complicated data with multiple methods to test robustness. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPhylogenetic methods can be used to also address other questions, such as how features of the genome influence diversification.
“Of note, phylogenetic methods can be used to also address other questions, such as how features of the genome influence diversification41–43.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] Nee, S. Birth–death models in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 1–17 (2006). source
- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
- cites [43] Revell, L. J. & Harmon, L. J. Phylogenetic Comparative Methods in R (Princeton Univ. Press, 2022). A very useful book providing a detailed guide for analysing data using phylogenetic comparative methods in the R programming language.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThis led to the development of numerous methods that take phylogeny into account and control for the non-independence of species.
“This led to the development of numerous methods that take phylogeny into account and control for the non-independence of species16,18,19,33.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991). source
- cites [18] Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). In this key paper, the authors argue that species cannot be considered as independent data points and introduce the method of phylogenetic independent contrasts. source
- cites [19] Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 (1989). This paper introduced the phylogenetic regression, a statistical framework to incorporate phylogenetic similarity into regression analyses. source
- cites [33] Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhile each approach is different, they all ultimately account and control for phylogenetic non-independence.
“While each approach is different, they all ultimately account and control for phylogenetic non-independence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn terms of controlling for phylogeny, using a phylogenetic regression or including the phylogeny as a random effect within a mixed model are largely analogous.
“In terms of controlling for phylogeny, using a phylogenetic regression or including the phylogeny as a random effect within a mixed model are largely analogous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningNon-independence of genes and genomes should be controlled for in statistical analyses to avoid incorrect conclusions.
“As with non-independence due to the phylogenetic history of species, non-independence of genes and genomes should be controlled for in statistical analyses to avoid incorrect conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThese results are open to multiple causal explanations.
“However, these results are open to multiple causal explanations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationTesting different ways of controlling for phylogeny is better than not controlling for phylogeny.
“And testing different ways of controlling for phylogeny is better than not controlling for phylogeny (Box 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Box 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere are many situations where relatively standard and accepted methods can be used.
“Nonetheless, there are many situations where relatively standard and accepted methods can be used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe number of genes per genome varies from 465 to 155,000 genes, which means that considering each gene as an independent data point would bias the data towards species with larger genomes.
“In addition, the number of genes per genome varies from 465 to 155,000 genes, which means that considering each gene as an independent data point would bias the data towards species with larger genomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComparative analyses in the genomic age have the potential to answer broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution.
“Comparative analyses in the genomic age have the potential to answer broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMethods are still being developed and debated for certain types of question.
“Methods are still being developed and debated for certain types of question”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Pagel, M. D. & Harvey, P. H. Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 413–440 (1988). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUniform sampling of genomes reduces bias in the dataset towards more sequenced species, but has no effect on the phylogenetic non-independence between those species.
“Uniform sampling of genomes reduces bias in the dataset towards more sequenced species, but has no effect on the phylogenetic non-independence between those species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe explosion of genomic data during the first quarter of the 21st century risks an accumulation of spurious results and conclusions if appropriate approaches and methods are not rapidly adopted.
“The explosion of genomic data during the first quarter of the 21st century calls for a rapid adoption of appropriate approaches and methods, or else risks an accumulation of spurious results and conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Genomic data has exploded during the first quarter of the 21st century.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt is unrealistic to assume that every possible confounding factor can be identified and controlled for, but phylogenetic methods offer a way to control for unknowns.
“It is unrealistic to assume that every possible confounding factor can be identified and controlled for, but phylogenetic methods offer a way to control for unknowns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMultiple genomes from the same species are not independent - in the extreme, they may even have arisen via duplication.
“However, multiple genomes from the same species are not independent – in the extreme, they may even have arisen via duplication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenComparative analyses can increase the chance of choosing the correct target for laboratory work, which could provide an efficiency benefit by preventing wasted experimental work.
“If comparative analyses can increase the chance of choosing the correct target for laboratory work, then this could provide an efficiency benefit by preventing wasted experimental work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningInsights from comparative analyses can reveal broad patterns which can then be explicitly tested experimentally.
“Insights from comparative analyses can reveal broad patterns which can then explicitly be tested experimentally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenComparative genomics can provide powerful insights.
“although comparative genomics can provide powerful insights”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThere is now no doubt that phylogenetic methods have revolutionized the field.
“there is now no doubt that they have revolutionized the field20,34,42,127,128”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- cites [34] Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. & West, S. A. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBoth approaches (comparative and experimental) have different pros and cons.
“Both approaches have different pros and cons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe success of comparative genomics relies on experiments and observations, both to generate hypotheses and data.
“the success of comparative genomics relies on experiments and observations, both to generate hypotheses and data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere was initially resistance and misunderstanding about the application of phylogenetic methods to study adaptation at the organismal level.
“while there was initially resistance and misunderstanding about the application of phylogenetic methods to study adaptation at the organismal level”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Ridley, M. Why not to use species in comparative tests. J. Theor. Biol. 136, 361–364 (1989). source
- cites [34] Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. & West, S. A. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [42] Cornwallis, C. K. & Griffin, A. S. A guided tour of phylogenetic comparative methods for studying trait evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 55, 181–204 (2024). A comprehensive review of the history of phylogenetic comparative methods and the latest advances. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExperimental insights can generate hypotheses which can then be examined in comparative analyses across species to look for generality.
“Vice versa, experimental insights can generate hypotheses which can then be examined in comparative analyses across species to look for generality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe greatest insights can often be made by the combination of comparative and experimental approaches.
“the greatest insights can often be made by their combination34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. & West, S. A. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The application of phylogeny-based comparative methods to genomic data has not been consistent, and has been limited in some areas such as microbial genomics.
“However, the application of phylogeny-based comparative methods to genomic data has not been consistent, and has been limited in some areas such as microbial genomics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The potential problem of non-independence remains to be fully recognized across the entire field of comparative genomics.
“The potential problem of non-independence remains to be fully recognized across the entire field of comparative genomics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many of those developing and using phylogeny-based methods focus on phenotypic, rather than genomic, traits.
“In contrast, many of those developing and using phylogeny-based methods focus on phenotypic, rather than genomic, traits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some sections of these fields have developed separately, with little discourse, although the problems and solutions are very similar.
“Consequently, some sections of these fields have developed separately, with little discourse, although the problems and solutions are very similar.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Genomic data has exploded during the first quarter of the 21st century.
“The explosion of genomic data during the first quarter of the 21st century”
Cites
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927 · see citing works
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
<b>brms</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using <i>Stan</i>
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476 · see citing works
ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R
Paradis, E., & Schliep, K. P. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 · Cited by 9,224 · see citing works
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676 · see citing works
O'Leary, N. A., Wright, M. W., Brister, J. R., Ciufo, S., Haddad, D., McVeigh, R., Rajput, B., Robbertse, B., Smith-White, B., Ako-Adjei, D., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · Cited by 6,357 · see citing works
Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1 · Cited by 5,553 · see citing works
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200 · see citing works
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package
Hadfield, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02 · Cited by 4,900 · see citing works
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678 · see citing works
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337 · see citing works
The earth is round (p < .05).
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003 · see citing works
Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species
Rhie, A., McCarthy, S. A., Fedrigo, O., Damas, J., Formenti, G., Koren, S., Uliano-Silva, M., Chow, W., Fungtammasan, A., Kim, J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 · Cited by 3,097 · see citing works
HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies
Pond, S. L. K., Frost, S. D. W., & Muse, S. V. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079 · Cited by 2,866 · see citing works
Parks, D. H., Chuvochina, M., Rinke, C., Mussig, A. J., Chaumeil, P.-A., & Hugenholtz, P. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab776 · Cited by 2,402 · see citing works
Grafen, A. (1989) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1989.0106 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies
Tam, V., Patel, N. K., Turcotte, M., Bossé, Y., Paré, G., & Meyre, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · Cited by 2,092 · see citing works
(1994) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · Cited by 1,859 · see citing works
CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution
De Bie, T., Cristianini, N., Demuth, J. P., & Hahn, M. W. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl097 · Cited by 1,790 · see citing works
A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat ( <i>Triticum aestivum</i> ) genome
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC), Mayer, K. F. X., Rogers, J., Doležel, J., Pozniak, C., Eversole, K., Feuillet, C., Gill, B., Friebe, B., Lukaszewski, A. J., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251788 · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
Bayesian Estimation of Ancestral Character States on Phylogenies
Pagel, M. D., Meade, A., & Barker, D. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490522232 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Koonin, E. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · Cited by 1,323 · see citing works
Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project
Lloyd-Price, J., Mahurkar, A., Rahnavard, G., Crabtree, J., Orvis, J., Hall, A. B., Brady, A., Creasy, H. H., McCracken, C., Giglio, M. G., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23889 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
Social evolution theory for microorganisms
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., Gardner, A., & Diggle, S. P. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1461 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Self-citationA Linear-Time Algorithm for Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Trait Evolution Models
Ho, L. S. T., & Ané, C. (2014) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu005 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Primate ecology and social organization
Clutton‐Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1977) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04171.x · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data: <i>Phylogenetic regression</i>
Revell, L. J. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00044.x · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Pagel, M., & Meade, A. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/503444 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
Revell, L. J., Harmon, L. J., & Collar, D. C. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802302427 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303327 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Pseudomonas syringae: what it takes to be a pathogen
Xin, X., Kvitko, B. H., & He, S. Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2018.17 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
The Philosophy of Multiple Comparisons
Tukey, J. W. (1991) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011945 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Tcherkez, G. G. B., Farquhar, G. D., & Andrews, T. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600605103 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread
David, S., Reuter, S., Harris, S. R., Glasner, C., Feltwell, T., Argimón, S., Abudahab, K., Goater, R., Giani, T., Errico, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing
Land, M., Hauser, L., Jun, S., Nookaew, I., Leuze, M. R., Ahn, T.-H., Karpinets, T. V., Lund, O., Kora, G., Wassenaar, T. M., et al. (2015) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-015-0433-4 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Huey, R. B., Garland, T., & Turelli, M. (2019) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/703055 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Sequence locally, think globally: the Darwin Tree of Life Project
The Darwin Tree of Life Project Consortium, Blaxter, M., Mieszkowska, N., Di Palma, F., Holland, P., Durbin, R., Richards, T., Berriman, M., Kersey, P., Hollingsworth, P., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115642118 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Logistic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables
Ives, A. R., & Garland, T. (2009) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp074 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
West, S. A. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400832019 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Self-citationThe unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters
Maddison, W. P., & FitzJohn, R. G. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu070 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics
Feng, S., Stiller, J., Deng, Y., Armstrong, J., Fang, Q., Reeve, A. H., Xie, D., Chen, G., Guo, C., Faircloth, B. C., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2873-9 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
A Primer on Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares
Symonds, M. R. E., & Blomberg, S. P. (2014) · Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_5 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Recent Developments in the Analysis of Comparative Data
Pagel, M. D., & Harvey, P. H. (1988) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/416027 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Comparative methods for explaining adaptations
Harvey, P. H., & Purvis, A. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351619a0 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Beaulieu, J. M., O'Meara, B. C., & Donoghue, M. J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt034 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation
Zoonomia Consortium, Genereux, D. P., Serres, A., Armstrong, J., Johnson, J., Marinescu, V. D., Murén, E., Juan, D., Bejerano, G., Casewell, N. R., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2876-6 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Evolution of the germline mutation rate across vertebrates
Bergeron, L. A., Besenbacher, S., Zheng, J., Li, P., Bertelsen, M. F., Quintard, B., Hoffman, J. I., Li, Z., Leger, J. S., Shao, C., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05752-y · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Birth-Death Models in Macroevolution
Nee, S. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110035 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Representation and participation across 20 years of plant genome sequencing
Marks, R. A., Hotaling, S., Frandsen, P. B., & VanBuren, R. (2021) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-021-01031-8 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment
Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00390 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco toward optimality in a low-dimensional landscape
Savir, Y., Noor, Ε., Milo, R., & Tlusty, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911663107 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Losos, J. B. (2011) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/660020 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0084 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior
Jennions, M. D. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/14.3.438 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
R$^{2}$s for Correlated Data: Phylogenetic Models, LMMs, and GLMMs
Ives, A. R. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy060 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Hardison, R. C. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000058 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods
Boettiger, C., Coop, G., & Ralph, P. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01574.x · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Convergent sequence evolution between echolocating bats and dolphins
Liu, Y., Cotton, J. A., Shen, B., Han, X., Rossiter, S. J., & Zhang, S. Y. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.058 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Eastman, J. M., Alfaro, M. E., Joyce, P., Hipp, A. L., & Harmon, L. J. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01401.x · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Hardenberg, A. V., & Gonzalez-Voyer, A. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01790.x · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Statistical Issues and Assumptions of Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares
Mundry, R. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_6 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Why Ecologists Need to be Phylogenetically Challenged
Harvey, P., Read, A. F., & Nee, S. (1995) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261606 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Revisiting Trade-offs between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters
Flamholz, A. I., Prywes, N., Moran, U., Davidi, D., Bar‐On, Y. M., Oltrogge, L. M., Alves, R., Savage, D. F., & Milo, R. (2019) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
The hearing gene Prestin unites echolocating bats and whales
Li, Y., Liu, Z., Shi, P., & Zhang, J. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.042 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
15 years of genome-wide association studies and no signs of slowing down
Loos, R. J. F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19653-5 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
phylopath : Easy phylogenetic path analysis in R
van der Bijl, W. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4718 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods: Learning From TreesPreprint
Harmon, L. J. (2019) · doi:10.32942/osf.io/e3xnr · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: comparative-genomics-based discoveries
Binnewies, T. T., Motro, Y., Hallin, P. F., Lund, O., Dunn, D., La, T., Hampson, D. J., Bellgard, M., Wassenaar, T. M., & Ussery, D. W. (2006) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-006-0027-2 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Cooperation facilitates the colonization of harsh environments
Cornwallis, C. K., Botero, C. A., Rubenstein, D. R., Downing, P. A., West, S. A., & Griffin, A. S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-016-0057 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationToward a genome sequence for every animal: Where are we now?
Hotaling, S., Kelley, J. L., & Frandsen, P. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109019118 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
León‐Sampedro, R., DelaFuente, J., Pérez, C. D.-A., Crellen, T., Musicha, P., Rodríguez-Beltrán, J., de la Vega, C., Hernández-García, M., R-GNOSIS WP5 Study Group, López‐Fresneña, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00879-y · Cited by 166 · see citing works
MP3: A Software Tool for the Prediction of Pathogenic Proteins in Genomic and Metagenomic Data
Gupta, A., Kapil, R., Dhakan, D. B., & Sharma, V. K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093907 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Phylogenetic comparative methods
Cornwell, W. K., & Nakagawa, S. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.049 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Statistics For Correlated Data: Phylogenies, Space, And Time
Ives, A. R., & Zhu, J. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-0702 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
SEX-RATIO ADJUSTMENT WHEN RELATIVES INTERACT: A TEST OF CONSTRAINTS ON ADAPTATION
West, S. A., Shuker, D. M., & Sheldon, B. C. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01772.x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralized hidden Markov models for phylogenetic comparative datasets
Boyko, J. D., & Beaulieu, J. M. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13534 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Did Genetic Drift Drive Increases in Genome Complexity?
Whitney, K. D., & Garland, T. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001080 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Maddamsetti, R., Yao, Y., Wang, T., Gao, J., Huang, V. T., Hamrick, G. S., Son, H.-I., & You, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45638-9 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Comparative Genomics of Host-Specific Virulence in Pseudomonas syringae
Sarkar, S. F., Gordon, J. S., Martin, G. B., & Guttman, D. S. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.060996 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
A positive correlation between GC content and growth temperature in prokaryotes
Hu, E.-Z., Lan, X.-R., Liu, Z.-L., Gao, J., & Niu, D.-K. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08353-7 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Symbioses shape feeding niches and diversification across insects
Cornwallis, C. K., Padje, A. V. ’., Ellers, J., Klein, M., Jackson, R., Kiers, E. T., West, S. A., & Henry, L. M. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02058-0 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationRERconverge: an R package for associating evolutionary rates with convergent traits
Kowalczyk, A. M., Meyer, W. K., Partha, R., Mao, W., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M. D. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz468 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
The social evolution of bacterial pathogenesis
Smith, J. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1330 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Evolution of Plasmid Mobility: Origin and Fate of Conjugative and Nonconjugative Plasmids
Coluzzi, C., Garcillán-Barcia, M. P., de la Cruz, F., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac115 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Martinez, J., Klasson, L., Welch, J. J., & Jiggins, F. M. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa209 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Comparative genomics provides insights into the aquatic adaptations of mammals
Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Liu, C., Wang, J., Gao, H., Hoelzel, A. R., Seim, I., Lv, M., Lin, M., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106080118 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Large-scale network analysis captures biological features of bacterial plasmids
Acman, M., van Dorp, L., Santini, J. M., & Balloux, F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16282-w · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions
Blommaert, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1441 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Miracles and Statistics: The Casual Assumption of Independence
Kruskal, W. (1988) · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478682 · Cited by 114
Exploring bacterial diversity via a curated and searchable snapshot of archived DNA sequences
Blackwell, G. A., Hunt, M., Malone, K. M., Lima, L., Horesh, G., Alako, B. T. F., Thomson, N. R., & Iqbal, Z. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001421 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Shaw, L. P., Chau, K., Kavanagh, J., AbuOun, M., Stubberfield, E. J., Gweon, H. S., Barker, L., Rodger, G., Bowes, M. J., Hubbard, A. T. M., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe3868 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Murray, G. G. R., Charlesworth, J., Miller, E. L., Casey, M. J., Lloyd, C. T., Gottschalk, M., Tucker, A. W. (., Welch, J. J., & Weinert, L. A. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa323 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Inference from binary comparative data
Read, A. F., & Nee, S. (1995) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1995.0047 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Pairwise comparisons across species are problematic when analyzing functional genomic data
Dunn, C. W., Zapata, F., Munro, C., Siebert, S., & Hejnol, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707515115 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Shaw, L. P., Rocha, E. P. C., & MacLean, R. C. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad452 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Kryuchkova-Mostacci, N., & Robinson‐Rechavi, M. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005274 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Rendueles, O., Garcia-Garcerà, M., Néron, B., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2017) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006525 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Why not to use species in comparative tests
Ridley, M. (1989) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80171-7 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
AllTheBacteria: a community resource empowers biology and discovers novel peptide antibiotics
Hunt, M., Torres, M. D. T., Alikhan, N.-F., Anderson, D., Andreani, M. L., Blom, J., Bouras, G., Brinkman, F. S. L., Carroll, L. M., Croxen, M. A., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.08.584059 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Capsules and their traits shape phage susceptibility and plasmid conjugation efficiency
Haudiquet, M., Le Bris, J., Nucci, A., Bonnin, R. A., Domingo-Calap, P., Rocha, E. P. C., & Rendueles, O. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46147-5 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes
Whelan, F. J., Rusilowicz, M., & McInerney, J. O. (2020) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000338 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, Z., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz049 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Rubisco Adaptation Is More Limited by Phylogenetic Constraint Than by Catalytic Trade-off
Bouvier, J. W., Emms, D. M., Rhodes, T., Bolton, J. S., Brasnett, A., Eddershaw, A., Nielsen, J. R., Unitt, A., Whitney, S. M., & Kelly, S. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab079 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ginty, S. É. M., Lehmann, L., Brown, S. P., & Rankin, D. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0400 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Virus Satellites Drive Viral Evolution and Ecology
Frígols, B., Quiles‐Puchalt, N., Mir‐Sanchis, I., Donderis, J., Elena, S. F., Buckling, A. G. J., Novick, R. P., Marina, A., & Penadés, J. R. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005609 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Bernheim, A. G., Bikard, D., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1091 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes
Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Belcher, L. J., Ghoul, M., & West, S. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2320170121 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationCooperative secretions facilitate host range expansion in bacteria
McNally, L., Viana, M. S., & Brown, S. P. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5594 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice
Raulo, A., Bürkner, P.-C., Finerty, G. E., Dale, J., Hanski, E., English, H. M., Lamberth, C., Firth, J. A., Coulson, T., & Knowles, S. C. L. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02381-0 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Rapid Evolution of the Sequences and Gene Repertoires of Secreted Proteins in Bacteria
Nogueira, T., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049403 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kin selection explains the evolution of cooperation in the gut microbiota
Simonet, C., & McNally, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016046118 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Evidence for Selection in the Abundant Accessory Gene Content of a Prokaryote Pangenome
Whelan, F. J., Hall, R. J., & McInerney, J. O. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab139 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dewar, A. E., Thomas, J. L., Scott, T. W., Wild, G., Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Ghoul, M. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01573-2 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationContingency, repeatability, and predictability in the evolution of a prokaryotic pangenome
Beavan, A. J. S., Domingo-Sananes, M. R., & McInerney, J. O. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304934120 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Genomic network analysis of environmental and livestock F-type plasmid populations
Matlock, W., Chau, K., AbuOun, M., Stubberfield, E. J., Barker, L., Kavanagh, J., Pickford, H., Gilson, D., Smith, R. P., Gweon, H. S., et al. (2021) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-021-00926-w · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Chak, S. T. C., Harris, S. E., Hultgren, K. M., Jeffery, N. W., & Rubenstein, D. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025051118 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Genetic exchanges are more frequent in bacteria encoding capsules
Rendueles, O., de Sousa, J. A. M., Bernheim, A., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007862 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Community diversity and habitat structure shape the repertoire of extracellular proteins in bacteria
Garcia-Garcera, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14572-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
A Guided Tour of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Studying Trait Evolution
Cornwallis, C. K., & Griffin, A. S. (2024) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102221-050754 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gene-gene relationships in an Escherichia coli accessory genome are linked to function and mobility
Hall, R. J., Whelan, F. J., Cummins, E. A., Connor, C., McNally, A., & McInerney, J. O. (2021) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000650 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kin selection for cooperation in natural bacterial populations
Belcher, L. J., Dewar, A. E., Ghoul, M., & West, S. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2119070119 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationHarris, L. N., Howland, K. E., Kowalchuk, M. W., Bajno, R., Lindsay, M. M., & Taylor, E. B. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.439 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Further Remarks on the Role of Phylogeny in Comparative Ecology
Harvey, P., Read, A. F., & Nee, S. (1995) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261643 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Larger colony sizes favoured the evolution of more worker castes in ants
Bell‐Roberts, L., Turner, J. F. R., Werner, G. D. A., Downing, P. A., Ross, L., & West, S. A. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02512-7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial complexity, life-history and lineage influence the molecular basis of castes in vespid wasps
Wyatt, C. D. R., Bentley, M. A., Taylor, D., Favreau, E., Brock, R. E., Taylor, B. A., Bell, E., Leadbeater, E., & Sumner, S. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36456-6 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Eusociality influences the strength of negative selection on insect genomes
Imrit, M. A., Dogantzis, K. A., Harpur, B. A., & Zayed, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1512 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Sociomics: Using Omic Approaches to Understand Social Evolution
Ghoul, M., Andersen, S. B., & West, S. A. (2017) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2017.03.009 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationSequencing effort dictates gene discovery in marine microbial metagenomes
Duarte, C. M., Ngugi, D. K., Alam, I., Pearman, J., Kamau, A., Eguiluz, V. M., Gojobori, T., Acinas, S. G., Gasol, J. M., Bajic, V., et al. (2020) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15182 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
GC Content Across Insect Genomes: Phylogenetic Patterns, Causes and Consequences
Kyriacou, R. G., Mulhair, P. O., & Holland, P. W. H. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-024-10160-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
de Albuquerque, N. R. M., Haag, K. L., Fields, P. D., Cabalzar, A., Ben‐Ami, F., Pombert, J., & Ebert, D. (2022) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jeu.12902 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cheating leads to the evolution of multipartite viruses
Leeks, A., Young, P. G., Turner, P. E., Wild, G., & West, S. A. (2023) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002092 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationFavreau, E., Geist, K. S., Wyatt, C. D. R., Toth, A. L., Sumner, S., & Rehan, S. M. (2022) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evac174 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A primer on correlation-based dimension reduction methods for multi-omics analysis
Downing, T., & Angelopoulos, N. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0344 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Mutational spectra are associated with bacterial niche
Ruis, C., Weimann, A., Tonkin‐Hill, G. Q., Pandurangan, A. P., Matuszewska, M., Murray, G. G. R., Lévesque, R. C., Blundell, T. L., Floto, R. A., & Parkhill, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42916-w · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Arikawa, K., & Hosokawa, M. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.09.010 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
SOCfinder: a genomic tool for identifying social genes in bacteria
Belcher, L. J., Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Katz, Z., Ghoul, M., & West, S. A. (2023) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.001171 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial insect colony size is correlated with rates of molecular evolution
Rubin, B. E. R. (2022) · Insectes Sociaux · doi:10.1007/s00040-022-00859-3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Brown, T. A. (2023) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003133162 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Genomics expands the mammalverse
Upham, N. S., & Landis, M. J. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2209 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bouvier, J. W., & Kelly, S. (2023) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154021 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A Tale of Too Many Trees: A Conundrum for Phylogenetic Regression
Adams, R. H. J., Lozano, J. R., Duncan, M., Green, J. E., Assis, R., & DeGiorgio, M. (2025) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf032 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Evo‐Scope : Fully automated assessment of correlated evolution on phylogenetic trees
Godfroid, M., Coluzzi, C., Lambert, A., Glaser, P., Rocha, E. P. C., & Achaz, G. (2023) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14190 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Is cooperation favored by horizontal gene transfer?
Scott, T. W., West, S. A., Dewar, A. E., & Wild, G. (2023) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1093/evlett/qrad003 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>Goldfinder</i> : Unraveling Networks of Gene Co-occurrence and Avoidance in Bacterial Pangenomes
Gavriilidou, A., Paulitz, E., Resl, C., Ziemert, N., Kupczok, A., & Baumdicker, F. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.29.591652 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gene transferability and sociality do not correlate with gene connectivity
Hao, C., Dewar, A. E., West, S. A., & Ghoul, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.1819 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationDowning, T., & Rahm, A. D. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20809-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Genes for cooperation are not more likely to be carried by plasmids
Dewar, A. E., Belcher, L. J., Scott, T. W., & West, S. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.2549 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationA tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression
Adams, R., Lozano, J. R., Duncan, M., Green, J., Assis, R., & DeGiorgio, M. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.16.580530 · Cited by 2
SOCfinder: a genomic tool for identifying cooperative genes in bacteriaPreprint
Belcher, L. J., Dewar, A. E., Hao, C., Katz, Z., Ghoul, M., & West, S. A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.16.562460
Self-citationGene-gene relationships in an Escherichia coli accessory genome are linked to function and mobility
Hall, R. J., Whelan, F. J., Cummins, E. A., Connor, C., McNally, A., & McInerney, J. O. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.26.437181
Coinfinder: Detecting Significant Associations and Dissociations in Pangenomes
Whelan, F. J., Rusilowicz, M., & McInerney, J. O. (2019) · doi:10.1101/859371
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ridley, M. The Explanation of Organic Diversity: The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating (Clarendon Press, 1983).
- Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. & West, S. A. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).
- Revell, L. J. & Harmon, L. J. Phylogenetic Comparative Methods in R (Princeton Univ. Press, 2022). A very useful book providing a detailed guide for analysing data using phylogenetic comparative methods in the R programming language.
- Grafen, A. & Hails, R. Modern Statistics for the Life Sciences (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).
- Garamszegi, L. Z. (ed.) Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (Springer, 2014). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yu, Y., Wheeler, N. E., & Barquist, L. (2025) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003539 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Behavioural ecology in the twenty-first century
West, S. A., Dall, S. R. X., Cunningham, J. P., Alonzo, S. H., & Griffin, A. S. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02912-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasmids promote antimicrobial resistance through insertion sequence-mediated gene inactivation
Sastre-Domínguez, J., Rodera-Fernandez, P., DelaFuente, J., Martínez-González, S., Quesada, S., Valencoso-Requena, M., Calvo‐Villamañán, A., Costas, C., Fuentes-Hernández, A., Santos-López, A., et al. (2026) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-026-02290-x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Larger colony sizes favour greater division of labour between queens and workers in ants
Turner, J. F. R., Bell‐Roberts, L., McCulloch, J., Brindle, M., Bonifacii, R. L., & West, S. A. (2025) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf250 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomic Touchstone: Benchmarking Genomic Language Models in the Context of the Central DogmaPreprint
Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Zeng, Q., Gao, Y., Ouyang, J., Xu, Y., Yang, S., He, S., Nie, Y., Cai, Y., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.25.661622 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jiao, S., Kang, Y., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Li, H., Li, W., & Qin, S. (2025) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy15081784 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Diversity, evolution, and transcription of endogenous retroviruses in Chiroptera genomes
Zhou, Z., Xiao, Y., Fang, J., Yao, Y., Yang, C., Dacheux, L., Luo, D., Qiu, Y., & Ge, X. (2025) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsaf021 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wang, D., Zheng, J., Xu, N., Sarsaiya, S., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.122080 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Robust regression rescues poor phylogenetic decisions
Duncan, M., DeGiorgio, M., Assis, R., & Adams, R. H. J. (2025) · BMC Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12862-025-02451-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Siepel, A. C., Hassett, R., & Staklinski, S. J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.24.696405 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Augmenting microbial phylogenomic signal with tailored marker gene sets
Secaira-Morocho, H., Jiang, X., & Zhu, Q. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64881-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Studying adaptation at the invisible scale
Griffin, A. S., & West, S. T. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2522021123 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Z., Huang, R., Guo, H.-J., & Niu, D. (2026) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syag024 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Genomic fingerprint of polyethylene-degrading bacteria
Peixoto, J., Rocha, R. T., Steindorff, A. S., & Krüger, R. H. (2026) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141930 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Aga, O. N. L., Moyo, S. J., Manyahi, J., Kibwana, U. O., Löhr, I. H., Langeland, N., Blomberg, B., & Johnston, I. G. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.20.677523 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zebrafish relatives as models for functional comparative genetics and genomics
Podobnik, M., Lu, Y., Irion, U., & Currie, P. D. (2026) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-026-01007-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pesireron, M., Senewe, R. E., Beti, J. A., Prihatini, R., Senewe, F. P., Kaihatu, S. S., Waas, E. D., & Leiwakabessy, C. (2025) · Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10722-025-02490-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cooperation and the evolution of bacterial niche breadth
Hao, C., Konno, N., Ito, M., Belcher, L. J., Iwasaki, W., & West, S. T. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2520645123 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Z., & Niu, D. (2026) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpag050 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wariss, H. M., Yang, L., Gu, J., Liu, D., & Li, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1754844 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Improvement of Insulin Resistance by Lactobacillus johnsonii-Derived Indole-3-Lactic Acid
Zhan, J.-L., Wang, Y., Yu, Y.-S., Xu, Y.-J., Wu, J.-J., Wen, J., Zou, B., Wang, H., Xu, Z., Peng, W., et al. (2026) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms14061231 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Renganathan, P. (2026) · Phycology · doi:10.3390/phycology6030097 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Genome variation of Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis
Bagal, U. R., Santos, A. R., Paes, R. A., Alves, L. G. D. B., Correa, L. R. C., Parnell, L. A., Brunelli, J. G. P., Chow, N. A., Pohl, J., Brito, V. R., et al. (2026) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0014203 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Recombination Rates Are Governed by Sex-Specific Evolutionary Programs in House MicePreprint
Wooldridge, L. K., Pietraho, M., DiSiena, P., Littman, S., Clauss, B., & Dumont, B. L. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.16.659996 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhao, M. (2025) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns-2025-0833
Sequence alignment and comparison tools
Gupta, P. P., Nair, H., Sonkusare, M., Tripathi, J., Shrivastava, A. K., Parab, M. M., & Dasgupta, D. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21980-1.00010-3
Patterns and drivers of genome-wide codon usage bias in the fungal order Sordariales
Hensen, N., Hiltunen, M., & Johannesson, H. (2025) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsaf036
Belcher, L. J., & Kelly, S. L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.27.702036 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolutionary Bioinformatics Expands its Breadth
Caetano‐Anollés, G. (2026) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/11769343261433786
Erözden, A. A., Tavşanlı, N., Çalışkan, M., & Arıkan, M. (2026) · Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11438-9_10
Jiang, Y., Deng, Y., Feng, B., Zhang, H., Xie, Y., Gao, J., Song, X., & Jin, J. (2026) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2026.105131
phyloPipeR: An R Package for End-to-End Phylogenetic Reconstruction and Tree Comparison
Li, F., Zou, Y., Li, T., Xie, L., Liu, D., 宋昆鸿, Luo, Y., Qin, D., Hao, Y., & Li, B. (2026) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb48060600
Aga, O. N. L., Moyo, S. J., Manyahi, J., Kibwana, U., Löhr, I. H., Langeland, N., Blomberg, B., & Johnston, I. G. (2026) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003848
Prasetyo, N. K., Langley, R. J., Radcliff, F. J., & Gardner, P. P. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.08.09.743793
From genomes to graphs: Why macroevolution still matters in the pangenome era
Liu, B. (2026) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.1111/jse.70102
Bai, X., Li, Z., Duan, C., Zhao, D., Dong, H., Zhu, X. F., Fan, H., Liu, X., Duan, Y., & Chen, L. (2026) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms14081851
Saraf, N., & Sharma, G. (2026) · iMetaOmics. · doi:10.1002/imo2.70140
Xu, J., He, Y., Zhou, X., & Zhan, X.-Y. (2026) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01109-26
Renganathan, P. (2026) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-026-05304-2
POGED: A Plant Orthologous Group Evolution DatabasePreprint
Wang, Y., Chen, G., Shouli, F., Tan, C., Wang, L., Jiang, H., Xu, S., Cai, S., 邬飞波, Zhang, G., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10838442/v1
Lifespan prediction in protostomes from trinucleotide compositionPreprint
Kondo, Y., Jarman, S., & Budd, A. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11265326/v1
- Authors
- Dewar, A. E., Belcher, L. J., & West, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dewar, Anna E.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2025-01-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 395-405
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- PMC
- PMC7617348
- OpenAlex
- W4406152994
- Semantic Scholar
- a5300c76f52fa96840c6b523b99692f2200b1e7b
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 147
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 16
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- comparative genomics, phylogenetic comparative analysis, phylogenetic non-independence, common ancestry, causal hypothesis testing, genome evolution, gene evolution, phylogenetic control
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review