The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nature of Nutrient Limitation in Plant Communities
Abstract
The concept of nutrient limitation, as developed in agriculture, applies well to wild plants grown under controlled conditions, although plants adapted to infertile soils are less responsive to nutrient addition than are most crop species. There are serious difficulties in transferring the concept of nutrient limitation directly to plant communities, however, because (1) in comparing communities with different dominant species, the species characteristic of nutrient-rich sites are inherently more responsive to nutrient supply and may be more strongly nutrient-limited than species in low-nutrient sites, and (2) ecosystem-level feedback complicates the analysis of experiments involving fertilization. We suggest that nutrient limitation in communities can be best measured by assessing the plants' response to large nutrient additions that are sufficient to saturate chemical and microbial immobilization processes and still meet plant nutrient requirements. The magnitude of community-level nutrient limitation is highly sensitive to the potential growth rate of component species; it may be greatest in sites of intermediate fertility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production
Mattson, W. J., & Addy, N. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4214.515 · Cited by 573
Cited by
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Self-citationNITROGEN LIMITATION OF NET PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS IS GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED
LeBauer, D. S., & Treseder, K. K. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-2057.1 · Cited by 2,766
Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies
Treseder, K. K. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x · Cited by 1,607
Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics
Guariguata, M. R., & Ostertag, R. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00535-1 · Cited by 1,380
Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation
Fornara, D. A., & Tilman, D. (2008) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01345.x · Cited by 808
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapin, F. S., Vitousek, P. M., & Van Cleve, K.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-58
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2043027881
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Nutrient Limitation in Plant Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284466
- The paper
- Chapin, F. S., Vitousek, P. M., & Van Cleve, K. (1986). The Nature of Nutrient Limitation in Plant Communities. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.