Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complementary Models for Ecosystems

Reiners, William A.·1986·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The ecosystem level of ecological research is fraught with conceptual difficulties that have contributed to faltering progress in theoretical development. An acceptance of multiple models for different aspects of ecosystems may assist in reducing this confusion. Two complementary models of ecosystems are suggested: the first based on energy, the second based on matter. Whereas the first follows from the second law of thermodynamics, the second complementary model derives from the chemical stoichiometry of the biota. These models can be developed independently but have many points of interaction. These points yield another series of predictions and hypotheses. While these complementary models serve as theoretical structures for much of the body of ecosystem concepts, they are not adequate by themselves. Other complementary models, perhaps centered on explicit linkages at the population and community levels, are necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284467

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Reiners, W. A.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1986-01
Volume
127
Issue
1
Pages
59-73
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2082757759
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complementary Models for Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284467
The paper
Reiners, W. A. (1986). Complementary Models for Ecosystems. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.