The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolutionary Stability of Aposematic Coloration and Prey Unprofitability: A Theoretical Analysis
Abstract
Species that have evolved some defense against predators, here called unprofitable prey, often show aposematic (warning) coloration. The process whereby a predator learns not to attack unprofitable prey is an essential ingredient in the interaction between predators and such prey. Using learning theory and evolutionary game theory, we develop a model of predator-prey interactions, focusing on two characters: prey unprofitability and prey coloration. Both these characters are treated as one-dimensional variables, and it is assumed that variation in coloration causes variation in the rate at which prey are detected by predators. Regarding the two characters as strategies used by prey individuals, we determine evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS's). The coloration yielding the smallest possible rate of detection is called cryptic, and colorations yielding higher rates of detection are called aposematic. Two aspects of predator behavior are shown to be important for the stability of an aposematic strategy: a reluctance to attack prey more conspicuously colored than those so far encountered, and faster avoidance learning vis-a-vis prey with more conspicuous coloration. At least one of these factors must be present for an aposematic strategy to be an ESS. Similarly, two factors are important for the evolution of prey unprofitability: increased survival of attacks by a predator, and faster avoidance learning vis-a-vis more-unprofitable prey. If there is a nonpredatory cost associated with unprofitability, at least one of these factors must be present for an unprofitable strategy to be an ESS. The first factor mentioned, both for coloration and unprofitability, results in individual selection. The second factor, variation in the rate of avoidance learning caused by variation in the character, produces a selection pressure only if there is a correlation between prey phenotypes encountered by the predator. Such correlation may be the result of relatedness among prey individuals (resulting in kin selection) or repeated encounters with the same prey individual.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Symmetry, beauty and evolution
Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372169a0 · Cited by 462
Self-citationPoison Frog Colors Are Honest Signals of Toxicity, Particularly for Bird Predators
Maan, M. E., & Cummings, M. E. (2012) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/663197 · Cited by 260
Do Glow‐Worm Larvae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) Use Warning Coloration?
De Cock, R., & Matthysen, E. (2001) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00746.x · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Leimar, O., Enquist, M., & Sillen-Tullberg, B.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-490
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2037311047
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary Stability of Aposematic Coloration and Prey Unprofitability: A Theoretical Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284581
- The paper
- Leimar, O., Enquist, M., & Sillen-Tullberg, B. (1986). Evolutionary Stability of Aposematic Coloration and Prey Unprofitability: A Theoretical Analysis. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.