Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 576

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal Egg Size and Clutch Size: Effects of Environment and Maternal Phenotype

Parker, Geoffrey A., Begon, Michael·1986·The American Naturalist

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a series of models for predicting optimal egg size and clutch size in different environments and for different maternal phenotypes. The models investigate the interaction between three components of fitness: (1) the intrinsic effect of egg size, (2) the density effect, the effect of the density of competing offspring (including competition with sibs and with non-sibs), and (3) the hierarchy effect, the effect of egg size relative to the sizes of competing eggs laid by other females. The environmental effects that we consider are the intensities of sib and non-sib competition, the number of egg-laying females, and some aspects of seasonal development. The particular aspects of maternal phenotype examined are foraging efficiency and the gametic reserve available at the time of egg laying (broadly equivalent to female size). Regarding environmental effects, increasing intensities of sib competition select for the production of smaller clutches of larger eggs, and increasing intensities of non-sib competition select for even smaller clutches of even larger eggs. We show, however, that this occurs because viability depends on egg phenotype, not because competition depends on density. In addition, we show that in seasonal environments the production of smaller clutches of larger eggs is favored by slower rates of preadult development and shorter overall season lengths. Regarding maternal phenotype, we derive the following conclusions. The intrinsic effects of egg size promote the production of eggs of a constant size by all females, so that larger females lay larger clutches. Sib competition (considered a density effect with no hierarchy component) favors constancy of clutch size for all females, so that larger females lay larger eggs. If, however, sib competition is coupled with circumstances in which females have high gametic reserves and/or low search costs for future oviposition sites, egg size and clutch size should vary with respect to female size, but larger females should lay more clutches. Non-sib competition acting through total competitor density (the density effect) favors the production of a constant clutch size by all females, such that larger females lay larger eggs. The action of non-sib competition on egg size relative to the sizes of others' eggs (the hierarchy effect), although tending to increase egg size overall, may cause smaller females to produce eggs larger than those produced by larger females. This latter effect, however, is confined to cases in which there are few competing females; typically, the hierarchy effect will favor approximately constant egg sizes for all females, so that larger females lay larger clutches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284589

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 576

Metadata

Authors
Parker, G. A., & Begon, M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1986-10
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
573-592
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2024962570
Cited by
576
References
2
FWCI
16.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Egg Size and Clutch Size: Effects of Environment and Maternal Phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284589
The paper
Parker, G. A., & Begon, M. (1986). Optimal Egg Size and Clutch Size: Effects of Environment and Maternal Phenotype. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284589

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.