The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Tolerance
Abstract
A theory for the expression of a population's response to density-independent gradients of environmental factors is derived for the case of asexuality. It is shown that the environmental tolerance of a genotype is a function of at least four parameters: g$_1$ and V$_{E1}$, the environmental optimum and its developmental variance between individuals, and g$_2$ and V$_{E2}$, the expected genetic contribution to the breadth of adaptation and its developmental variance. The realized breadth of adaptation of a genotype (V$^{1/2}$) is a complex function of g$_2$, V$_{E1}$, and V$_{E2}$, but we argue that, with an appropriate scale transformation, the tolerance curve of a genotype is approximately normal, with mean g$_1$ and standard deviation V$^{1/2}$. It is shown that temporal heterogeneity in the environment selects for more-broadly-adapted genotypes but that the within-generation component (V$_{\phitw}$) plays a more prominent role than the between-generation component (V$_{\phitb}$). Spatial heterogeneity selects for higher V$^{1/2}$ only when it occurs in conjunction with temporal variance within generations and only if V$_{\phitb}$ is small relative to V$_{\phitw}$. We argue that since g$_2$ is expected to evolve subject to the constraint that V$^{1/2}$ is optimized, species exposed to conditions favoring identical V$^{1/2}$ may evolve different g$_2$ if pronounced interspecific differences exist for V$_{E1}$ and V$_{E2}$. A maximum-likelihood method is shown to be capable of generating accurate estimates of the genotypic parameters g$_1$, g$_2$, V$_{E1}$, and V$_{E2}$ with moderately large samples. We suggest how this procedure may be used to estimate analogous parameters for a population of mixed genotypes and to obtain estimates of the genetic variance for the environmental optimum and breadth of adaptation. The potential utility of this methodology for the analysis of data routinely generated in programs for environmental assessment and plant breeding is pointed out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Quantitative Survey of Local Adaptation and Fitness Trade‐Offs
Hereford, J. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/597611 · Cited by 1,247
Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts
Chown, S. L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2006) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(06)33002-0 · Cited by 573
Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis
Gaston, K. J., Chown, S. L., & Evans, K. L. (2008) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01772.x · Cited by 353
The evolution of thermal physiology in endotherms
Cooper, B. S. (2010) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/e148 · Cited by 293
The World Is not Flat: Defining Relevant Thermal Landscapes in the Context of Climate Change
Sears, M. W., Raskin, E., & Angilletta, M. J. (2011) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icr111 · Cited by 288
Buckley, L. B., Ehrenberger, J. C., & Angilletta, M. J. (2015) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12406 · Cited by 268
A proximate model for thermal tolerance in ectotherms
Van Der Have, T. M. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980115.x · Cited by 110
Evolution and dispersal under climatic instability: a simple evolutionary algorithm
Grove, M. (2014) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712314533573 · Cited by 38
Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments
Nisioti, E., & Moulin-Frier, C. (2023) · The 2023 Conference on Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/isal_a_00668 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, M., & Gabriel, W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-303
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W4237983596
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.