The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproductive Effort in Plants. 1. Carbon Allocation to Reproduction
Abstract
Reproductive effort, or the proportion of an organism's resources allocated to reproduction, is a crucial aspect of an organism's life history; the optimal allocation of resources to reproduction in different environments has been the subject of much theorizing. Adequate tests of these theories have been hampered by the difficulties involved in assessing reproductive effort. In this paper, we address the problem of determining which structures and activities should be considered part of reproduction, using Agropyron repens as the experimental material. We approached the problem by first determining the structures and activities necessary for vegetative growth and then determining reproductive structures and activities by subtraction. Using carbon as the currency of allocation, we defined vegetative growth as those structures directly involved in the capture of carbon (i.e., leaves) plus all necessary support structures and activities. The necessary support structures and activities were determined by comparison with vegetative plants grown under similar conditions. Reproduction in A. repens involves not only the production of flowering and fruiting structures, but also the production of a substantial amount of stem material, the loss of carbon through respiration, and carbon gain through photosynthesis. Reproductive photosynthesis includes both direct photosynthesis by the reproductive structures and reproductive enhancement of leaf photosynthesis. Simple measures of reproductive effort based on biomass allocation to flowering and fruiting structures do not adequately reflect carbon allocation to reproduction since there is both genotypic and environmentally induced variation among plants in the amount of reproductive stem material and in the ability to compensate for the cost of reproduction through reproductive photosynthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
The Ecology And Economics Of Storage In Plants
Chapin, F. (1990) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.21.1.423 · Cited by 1,731
The costs of reproduction in plants
Obeso, J. R. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x · Cited by 1,377
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2197 · Cited by 1,111
Why does phenology drive species distribution?
Chuine, I. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0142 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Reekie, E. G., & Bazzaz, F. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 876-896
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2039137363
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Effort in Plants. 1. Carbon Allocation to Reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284681
- The paper
- Reekie, E. G., & Bazzaz, F. A. (1987). Reproductive Effort in Plants. 1. Carbon Allocation to Reproduction. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.