Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations

Heisler, I. Lorraine, Damuth, John·1987·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Individual fitness depends on the particular ecological, genetic, and social contexts in which organisms are found. Variation in individual context among subunits of a population thus raises interesting questions about selection in nature but also complicates its study. We present a method for analyzing phenotypic selection in hierarchically structured populations. Applying this method, called contextual analysis, to the study of selection allows explicit answers to two frequently controversial questions. First, must group membership be taken into account in explaining differences in individual fitness? Second, what particular group properties are associated with observable group-level effects? Contextual analysis is a generalization to structured populations of the "selection gradient" method developed by Lande and Arnold (1983). The aim of the gradient method is to distinguish characters that have a causal relationship with fitness from others that do not but are still subject to selection as a result of their phenotypic correlations with other traits. This distinction is made using the partial regression coefficients of fitness on the set of characters being investigated. Contextual analysis extends this method to include group as well as individual characters in a multiple-regression analysis of fitness. The partial regression coefficients associated with the group characters estimate the ability of specific group properties to account for variance in individual fitness in excess of what can be accounted for by the phenotypes of the group members themselves. In this way, contextual analysis permits independent group-level effects on fitness to be distinguished from changes in group characters solely as a result of their correlations with individual-level traits. While applicable to a wide range of problems, contextual analysis makes two particular contributions to the study of group selection: it clarifies the much-debated concept of "emergence"; and it provides a powerful analytic tool for studying group selection in nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284732

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Heisler, I. L., & Damuth, J.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1987-10
Volume
130
Issue
4
Pages
582-602
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2077554698
Cited by
335
References
4
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284732
The paper
Heisler, I. L., & Damuth, J. (1987). A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284732

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.