The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Phylogenetic Study of Adaptive Zones: Has Phytophagy Promoted Insect Diversification?
Abstract
Simpson's postulate that rapid diversification follows entrance into a new "adaptive zone" is frequently invoked a posteriori for groups of unusual diversity. The postulate can be tested more rigorously by defining an adaptive zone according to ecological criteria, independent of particular groups of organisms. The adaptive-zone hypothesis predicts that if multiple lineages have invaded a new adaptive zone, they should be consistently more diverse than their (equally old) sister groups, when the latter retain the more primitive way of life. Higher-plant feeding among insects is an independently defined, repeatedly invaded adaptive zone, to which a profound acceleration of diversification rate has been attributed. We have quantified the evidence for this hypothesis by comparing sister groups and species diversity of as many phytophagous insect groups as current taxonomic evidence allows. A sign test showed significant association of diversification rate with the adoption of phytophagy. The possible artifactual bases for this trend are discussed and provisionally rejected. We discuss several possible biological explanations for the association, including models of phylogenesis either dependent on or independent of ecological role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The global diversity of birds in space and time
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K., & Mooers, A. O. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11631 · Cited by 3,934
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
Harmon, L. J., Losos, J. B., Jonathan Davies, T., Gillespie, R. G., Gittleman, J. L., Bryan Jennings, W., Kozak, K. H., McPeek, M. A., Moreno-Roark, F., Near, T. J., et al. (2010) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01025.x · Cited by 834
Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation
Barton, N. H., & Charlesworth, B. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001025 · Cited by 681
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Biodiversity studies: Science and policy
Ehrlich, P. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5021.758 · Cited by 666
Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores
Futuyma, D. J., & Agrawal, A. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904106106 · Cited by 632
Detecting hidden diversification shifts in models of trait-dependent speciation and extinction
Beaulieu, J. M., & O’Meara, B. C. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw022 · Cited by 579
Rabosky, D. L. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01333.x · Cited by 448
Escalation of Plant Defense: Do Latex and Resin Canals Spur Plant Diversification?
Farrell, B. D., Dussourd, D. E., & Mitter, C. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285258 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitter, C., Farrell, B., & Wiegmann, B.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-128
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2142973105
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Phylogenetic Study of Adaptive Zones: Has Phytophagy Promoted Insect Diversification? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284840
- The paper
- Mitter, C., Farrell, B., & Wiegmann, B. (1988). The Phylogenetic Study of Adaptive Zones: Has Phytophagy Promoted Insect Diversification? The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.