The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores
Open accessAbstract
Terrestrial biodiversity is dominated by plants and the herbivores that consume them, and they are one of the major conduits of energy flow up to higher trophic levels. Here, we address the processes that have generated the spectacular diversity of flowering plants (>300,000 species) and insect herbivores (likely >1 million species). Long-standing macroevolutionary hypotheses have postulated that reciprocal evolution of adaptations and subsequent bursts of speciation have given rise to much of this biodiversity. We critically evaluate various predictions based on this coevolutionary theory. Phylogenetic reconstruction of ancestral states has revealed evidence for escalation in the potency or variety of plant lineages' chemical defenses; however, escalation of defense has been moderated by tradeoffs and alternative strategies (e.g., tolerance or defense by biotic agents). There is still surprisingly scant evidence that novel defense traits reduce herbivory and that such evolutionary novelty spurs diversification. Consistent with the coevolutionary hypothesis, there is some evidence that diversification of herbivores has lagged behind, but has nevertheless been temporally correlated with that of their host-plant clades, indicating colonization and radiation of insects on diversifying plants. However, there is still limited support for the role of host-plant shifts in insect diversification. Finally, a frontier area of research, and a general conclusion of our review, is that community ecology and the long-term evolutionary history of plant and insect diversification are inexorably intertwined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION
Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (1964) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x · Cited by 4,495
Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P., & Chapin, F. S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.230.4728.895 · Cited by 3,967
Root, R. B. (1973) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942161 · Cited by 3,042
Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense
Feeny, P. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1 · Cited by 2,344
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
Herbivores. Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites.
Wilcock, C. C., Rosenthal, G. A., & Janzen, D. H. (1981) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259845 · Cited by 1,984
Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness
Wiens, J. J., & Donoghue, M. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011 · Cited by 1,962
(1945) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/38.3.396 · Cited by 1,852
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1086/279763 · doi:10.1086/279763
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb00107.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb00107.x
- DJ Futuyma, Sympatric speciation: Norm or exception? Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, ed K Tilmon (Univ California Press, Berkeley), pp. 136–148 (2008).
- C Mitter, DR Brooks, Phylogenetic aspects of coevolution. Coevolution, eds DJ Futuyma, M Slatkin (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), pp. 65–98 (1983).
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1:IPICE]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1:ipice]2.0.co;2
- 10.1126/science.230.4728.895 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1442-1984.2000.00029.x · doi:10.1046/j.1442-1984.2000.00029.x
- IF Makarevich, KV Zhernoklev, TV Slyusarskaya, GN Yarmolenko, Cardenolid-containing plants of Cruciferae family. Chem Nat Comp, pp. 303–320 (1994).
- LS Adler, Selection by pollinators and herbivores on attraction and defense. Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, ed K Tilmon (Univ California Press, Berkeley), pp. 162–173 (2008).
- 10.1007/s10886-005-5793-0 · doi:10.1007/s10886-005-5793-0
- 10.1007/BF00323769 · doi:10.1007/bf00323769
- 10.2307/1938625 · doi:10.2307/1938625
- AA Agrawal, et al., Tempo of trait evolution in the milkweeds: Evidence for adaptive radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009).
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00666.x · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00666.x
- IS Winkler, C Mitter, The phylogenetic dimension of insect/plant interactions: A summary of recent evidence. Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, ed K Tilmon (Univ California Press, Berkeley), pp. 240–263 (2008).
- 10.2307/2666131 · doi:10.2307/2666131
- 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7020127.x · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7020127.x
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:lsalli]2.0.co;2
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00433.x · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00433.x
- N Janz, S Nylin, The oscillation hypothesis of host–plant range. Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, ed K Tilmon (Univ California Press, Berkeley), pp. 203–215 (2008).
- 10.1554/05-222.1 · doi:10.1554/05-222.1
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00069.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00069.x
- 10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001.00091.x · doi:10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001.00091.x
- 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00293.x · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00293.x
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00292.x · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00292.x
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11918.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11918.x
- 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1988.tb00321.x · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0469.1988.tb00321.x
- 10.1073/pnas.0608253104 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608253104
- 10.1890/05-0219 · doi:10.1890/05-0219
- 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980.tb01143.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980.tb01143.x
- 10.1007/s004420000477 · doi:10.1007/s004420000477
- 10.1006/bijl.2001.0542 · doi:10.1006/bijl.2001.0542
Cited by
Erb, M., & Kliebenstein, D. J. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.20.00433 · Cited by 1,333
Testing for coevolutionary diversification: linking pattern with process
Althoff, D. M., Segraves, K. A., & Johnson, M. T. J. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.11.003 · Cited by 176
Plant–arthropod interactions: who is the winner?
Stahl, E., Hilfiker, O., & Reymond, P. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13773 · Cited by 164
Vermeij, G. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124123 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Futuyma, D. J., & Agrawal, A. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 18054-18061
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1995858030
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 22.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0904106106
- The paper
- Futuyma, D. J., & Agrawal, A. A. (2009). Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904106106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.