The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Continuum of Plant Responses to Herbivory: The Influence of Plant Association, Nutrient Availability, and Timing
Abstract
In a single population of Ipomopsis arizonica (Polemoniaceae), we show a continuum of compensatory responses to vertebrate herbivory. We demonstrate experimentally that the degree of herbivore impact depends on plant association, nutrient availability, and timing of grazing. From 1985 to 1987, the most common response to vertebrate herbivory was equal compensation, whereby grazed plants set numbers of fruits and seeds equal to controls within the same growing season. However, we also observed cases of significant overcompensation and undercompensation. In 1985 and 1987, overcompensation occurred in vertebrate-grazed plants that were supplemented with nutrients and growing free of competition. These plants produced 33% to 120% more fruit than control, ungrazed plants. Cases of undercompensation occurred in groups where I. arizonica grew in association with grasses or where nutrients were not supplemented. Grazed and clipped plants in these groups produced from 28% to 82% as many fruits as did ungrazed controls. Our studies indicate that the compensatory response of plants to grazing is probabilistic when three external factors are considered. The probability of compensation for herbivory decreases as competition with other plants increases, as nutrient levels decrease, and as the timing of herbivory comes later in the growing season.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Augustine, D. J., & McNaughton, S. J. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801981 · Cited by 1,129
Seastedt, T. R., & Knapp, A. K. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285494 · Cited by 199
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Trophic cascades in agricultural landscapes: Indirect effects of landscape composition on crop yield
Liere, H., Kim, T. N., Werling, B. P., Meehan, T. D., Landis, D. A., & Gratton, C. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/14-0570.1 · Cited by 80
Singer, F. J., Wang, G., & Hobbs, N. T. (2003) · Mammal Community Dynamics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615757.014 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Maschinski, J., & Whitham, T. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1967466803
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Continuum of Plant Responses to Herbivory: The Influence of Plant Association, Nutrient Availability, and Timing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284962
- The paper
- Maschinski, J., & Whitham, T. G. (1989). The Continuum of Plant Responses to Herbivory: The Influence of Plant Association, Nutrient Availability, and Timing. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.