Cited by 81Avian ecology and behaviorEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Evolution of Flightlessness in Rails (Gruiformes: Rallidae): Phylogenetic, Ecomorphological, and Ontogenetic Perspectives

Livezey, Bradley C.·2003·Ornithological Monographs

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40168337

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livezey, B. C.
Corresponding author
Livezey, Bradley C.
Venue
Ornithological Monographs
Published
2003-01
Issue
53
Pages
iii-654
ISSN
  • 0078-6594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2282
OpenAlex
W2319249226
Cited by
81
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ornithological Monographs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
flightlessness, rails, Rallidae, Gruiformes, phylogenetic analysis, ecomorphology, ontogeny, bird flight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review