The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variance and the Value of Information
Abstract
A simple way to approximate the value of information is proposed. This approximation suggests that two kinds of quantities are important in determining the value of information: (1) the optimal behaviors that would be chosen if the decision maker knew which subtype (or state) of the resource it faced; and (2) the costs of small deviations from these subtype optima. I show that the value of information is approximately equal to the product of the mean cost of small deviations from the subtype optima and the variance of a modified distribution of the optimal behaviors. This helps to resolve the conflict between a result from economics, which shows that the value of information does not increase with the variance of subtypes, and results from theoretical behavioral ecology, which show that the effect of adding incomplete information to "conventional" models is greatest when the variance of subtypes is greatest. There is no conflict here as long as an increase in the variance of subtypes results in an increase in the variance of subtype optima, as is often the case. I discuss how changes in a problem's payoff structure change the value of information. The procedure for calculating the value of attending to a partially informative cue is outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Börger, L., Dalziel, B. D., & Fryxell, J. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x · Cited by 616
Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications
Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E. (2003) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x · Cited by 486
Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
CaraDonna, P. J., Petry, W. K., Brennan, R. M., Cunningham, J. L., Bronstein, J. L., Waser, N. M., & Sanders, N. J. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12740 · Cited by 395
Animal Foraging and the Evolution of Goal‐Directed Cognition
Hills, T. T. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50 · Cited by 331
Impacts of hunting on mammals in African tropical moist forests: a review and synthesis
FA, J. E., & BROWN, D. (2009) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00149.x · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, D. W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-140
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1990099486
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variance and the Value of Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284969
- The paper
- Stephens, D. W. (1989). Variance and the Value of Information. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.