Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications

Open access
Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., Lyon, B. E.·2003·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Longitudinal records of prey selection by 10 adult female sea otters on the Monterey Peninsula, California, from 1983 to 1990 demonstrate extreme inter‐individual variation in diet. Variation in prey availability cannot explain these differences as the data were obtained from a common spatial‐temporal area. Individual dietary patterns persisted throughout our study, thus indicating that they are life‐long characteristics. Individual dietary patterns in sea otters appear to be transmitted along matrilines, probably by way of learning during the period of mother–young association. Efficient utilization of different prey types probably requires radically different sensory/motor skills, each of which is difficult to acquire and all of which may exceed the learning and performance capacities of any single individual. This would explain the absence of generalists and inertia against switching, but not the existence of alternative specialists. Such individual variation might arise in a constant environment from frequency‐dependent effects, whereby the relative benefit of a given prey specialization depends on the number of other individuals utilizing that prey. Additionally, many of the sea otter's prey fluctuate substantially in abundance through time. This temporal variation, in conjunction with matrilineal transmission of foraging skills, may act to mediate the temporal dynamics of prey specializations. Regardless of the exact cause, such extreme individual variation in diet has broad ramifications for population and community ecology. The published literature indicates that similar patterns occur in many other species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
144-155
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2128619533
Cited by
486
References
52
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x
The paper
Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E. (2003). Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.