The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Longitudinal records of prey selection by 10 adult female sea otters on the Monterey Peninsula, California, from 1983 to 1990 demonstrate extreme inter‐individual variation in diet. Variation in prey availability cannot explain these differences as the data were obtained from a common spatial‐temporal area. Individual dietary patterns persisted throughout our study, thus indicating that they are life‐long characteristics. Individual dietary patterns in sea otters appear to be transmitted along matrilines, probably by way of learning during the period of mother–young association. Efficient utilization of different prey types probably requires radically different sensory/motor skills, each of which is difficult to acquire and all of which may exceed the learning and performance capacities of any single individual. This would explain the absence of generalists and inertia against switching, but not the existence of alternative specialists. Such individual variation might arise in a constant environment from frequency‐dependent effects, whereby the relative benefit of a given prey specialization depends on the number of other individuals utilizing that prey. Additionally, many of the sea otter's prey fluctuate substantially in abundance through time. This temporal variation, in conjunction with matrilineal transmission of foraging skills, may act to mediate the temporal dynamics of prey specializations. Regardless of the exact cause, such extreme individual variation in diet has broad ramifications for population and community ecology. The published literature indicates that similar patterns occur in many other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1969) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/bf01601953 · Cited by 3,138
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., Yang, L. H., Davis, J. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Forister, M. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343878 · Cited by 2,762
Red Deer. Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
Watson, A., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., & Albon, S. D. (1983) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4471 · Cited by 2,460
THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION
Futuyma, D. J., & Moreno, G. (1988) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001231 · Cited by 2,287
Herbivores. Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites.
Wilcock, C. C., Rosenthal, G. A., & Janzen, D. H. (1981) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259845 · Cited by 1,984
An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology
Royle, N. J. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.003 · Cited by 1,612
Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites
Chapman, R. F. (1980) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(80)90169-3 · Cited by 1,431
Cited by
Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology
Bolnick, D. I., Amarasekare, P., Araújo, M. S., Bürger, R., Levine, J. M., Novak, M., Rudolf, V. H. W., Schreiber, S. J., Urban, M. C., & Vasseur, D. A. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009 · Cited by 2,372
The interplay between social networks and culture: theoretically and among whales and dolphins
Cantor, M., & Whitehead, H. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0340 · Cited by 149
Camprasse, E. C. M., Sutton, G. J., Berlincourt, M., & Arnould, J. P. Y. (2017) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-155
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2128619533
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x
- The paper
- Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E. (2003). Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.