The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Foraging in Mammalian Herbivores: New Models of Functional Response
Abstract
The outcome of many high-order processes in ecology depends on the way in which the abundance and distribution of plants affect the eating rate of mammalian herbivores. However, simple, mechanistic models describing the operation of the functional response of these animals have failed to emerge. We offer new models describing the effects of spatial and morphological characteristics of plants on the intake rate of plant tissue by mammalian herbivores feeding within plant patches. We structure our models to respond to three patterns of plant availability: (1) spatially dispersed, apparent plants; (2) spatially dispersed, nonapparent plants; and (3) spatially concentrated plants. We depart from the traditional representations of predator functional response in assuming that searching for food and processing it can overlap in time. Our models illustrate that several distinct mechanisms can account for Type II functional responses frequently seen in herbivores. We show how differences among these mechanisms can explain anomalies in the empirical literature on regulation of intake rate of mammalian herbivores including divergence in functional responses between grazers and browsers, linear functional response curves, and curves showing zero slope throughout the domain of food availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism
Holling, C. S. (1959) · The Canadian Entomologist · doi:10.4039/ent91385-7 · Cited by 4,609
Scaling Why is animal size so important?
Schmidt‐Nielsen, K. (1984) · Cited by 2,654
The Social Organisation of Antelope in Relation To Their Ecology
Jarman, P. J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00345 · Cited by 2,191
(1982) · Cited by 2,048
Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes
Farris, D. A., Ivlev, V. S., & Scott, D. (1962) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1439522 · Cited by 1,751
A hierarchical concept of ecosystems
O’Neill, R. V. (1986) · Cited by 1,598
Herbivory: the Dynamics of Animal-plant Interactions
Crawley, M. J. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,211
Kotliar, N. B., & Wiens, J. A. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545542 · Cited by 1,192
Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies
Senft, R. L., Coughenour, M. B., Bailey, D. W., Rittenhouse, L. R., Sala, O. E., & Swift, D. M. (1987) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310545 · Cited by 1,156
Grazing Lawns: Animals in Herds, Plant Form, and Coevolution
McNaughton, S. J. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284321 · Cited by 979
Cited by
PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY
Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R. (2002) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:pfrdbh]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 718
Catastrophic vegetation shifts and soil degradation in terrestrial grazing systems
van de Koppel, J., Rietkerk, M., & Weissing, F. J. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01133-6 · Cited by 349
Ungulate preference for burned patches reveals strength of fire–grazing interaction
Allred, B. W., Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., & Elmore, R. D. (2011) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.12 · Cited by 313
The Scaling of Intake Rate in Mammalian Herbivores
Shipley, L. A., Gross, J. E., Spalinger, D. E., Hobbs, N. T., & Wunder, B. A. (1994) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285648 · Cited by 276
Self-citationThe allometry of patch selection in ruminants
Wilmshurst, J. F., Fryxell, J. M., & Bergman, C. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1007 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Spalinger, D. E., & Hobbs, N. T.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-348
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1968081548
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Foraging in Mammalian Herbivores: New Models of Functional Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285415
- The paper
- Spalinger, D. E., & Hobbs, N. T. (1992). Mechanisms of Foraging in Mammalian Herbivores: New Models of Functional Response. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.