The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to Altitude
Abstract
For trees, mammals, birds, reptiles, insects, and amphibians, the species richness on mountaintops is generally less than that of lowland areas. Coincident with this decline in species richness with increasing elevation is an increase in the altitudinal range of species. This pattern is analogous to the relationship between the latitudinal range of species and latitude (Rapoport's latitudinal rule). Both of these Rapoport phenomena, the latitudinal and the new elevational rule discussed here, can be explained as being results of differences in the breadth of climatic conditions organisms experience along the geographical gradients. The influence of latitudinal or altitudinal range size on local species richness is poorly understood, but the tendency for range margins to fall in species-rich, rather than species-poor, areas may mean that species-rich communities contain many species that are maintained only through immigration. The presence of these persistent but locally non-self-maintaining populations may explain the increased number of species found in rich communities as compared to species-poor communities without the need to invoke other differences in local species interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness
Colwell, R. K., & Lees, D. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01767-x · Cited by 1,121
Ecology Drives the Worldwide Distribution of Human Diseases
Guernier, V., Hochberg, M. E., & Guégan, J.-F. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020141 · Cited by 693
Nonbiological Gradients in Species Richness and a Spurious Rapoport Effect
Colwell, R. K., & Hurtt, G. C. (1994) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285695 · Cited by 688
NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?
Scott, J. M., Davis, F. W., McGhie, R. G., Wright, R. G., Groves, C., & Estes, J. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0999:nrdtct]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 580
Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3236601 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, G. C.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 893-911
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1974479907
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to Altitude. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285447
- The paper
- Stevens, G. C. (1992). The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to Altitude. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.