The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Floral Traits, Pollinator Visitation, and Plant Size on Ipomopsis aggregata Fruit Production
Abstract
Current understanding of reproduction for animal-pollinated plant species is based on the premise that traits of flowers and inflorescences influence reproductive success by affecting pollinator behavior. This implies that within-population variation in such traits should affect reproductive success. I used path analysis and structural equation modeling to test this hypothesis for two populations of the monocarpic herb Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). The basic hypothesis proposes that pollinator behavior may be affected by plant traits (including floral nectar production rate, corolla size, number of open flowers, and inflorescence height) and that behavior, along with plant size, may influence reproductive success through female function (proportion fruit set and total fruit production). This hypothesis was consistent with the data in both populations, although the specific details of the appropriate formulation varied. For both populations, the basic hypothesis is significantly better as a description of the interactions than alternative hypotheses that ignore the effects of plant traits on pollinator behavior or plant size on reproduction. In one population, disallowing the effects of pollinator behavior on reproduction significantly decreased the fit of model to data, and in the other, the decrease was almost significant (P = .06). Overall, the fundamental causal relationships proposed in the basic hypothesis were confirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Clements, F. E., & Long, F. L. (1923) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.20274 · Cited by 56
Cited by
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Grace, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617799 · Cited by 2,432
Austin, M. (2007) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005 · Cited by 1,504
Thompson, J. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000531 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, R. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 870-889
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1965780536
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Floral Traits, Pollinator Visitation, and Plant Size on Ipomopsis aggregata Fruit Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285637
- The paper
- Mitchell, R. J. (1994). Effects of Floral Traits, Pollinator Visitation, and Plant Size on Ipomopsis aggregata Fruit Production. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.