The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary Genetics of the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Abstract
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is becoming one of the most thoroughly investigated regions in vertebrate genomes. This region was first studied because of its importance in tissue transplantation and the immune system in humans. Now there is detailed genetic knowledge on many of the over 80 genes in the MHC, both about the extent and pattern of genetic variation in this region and about the molecular structure and functions of the molecules coded by its genes. For example, the level of amino acid heterozygosity is often extremely high, reaching over 60% at some amino acid sites with primary immune function (i.e., those involved with presenting peptides to the T-cell receptor). The frequency distribution of alleles at many of the loci in this region is quite even, and, in some populations, there is an observed deficiency of homozygotes. These and other observations point to the importance of some type of balancing selection operating in this region. It is generally assumed that this selection is related to the basic role of the MHC as part of the vertebrate immune system acting to prevent attack by viruses, bacteria, and other parasites. In addition, research suggests that there is selection at the MHC involved with maternal-fetal interactions and nonrandom mating. As a result of our detailed understanding of this region and its obvious selective importance, it now can be considered another classic example of an adaptive polymorphism, one that may be used as an evolutionary genetic paradigm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bjorkman, P. J., Saper, M. A., Samraoui, B., Bennett, W. S., Strominger, J. L., & Wiley, D. C. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/329512a0 · Cited by 2,377
Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations
Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A. (1968) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01245622 · Cited by 2,035
On measures of gametic disequilibrium.
Lewontin, R. C. (1988) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/120.3.849 · Cited by 712
Cited by
The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex
Piertney, S. B., & Oliver, M. K. (2006) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800724 · Cited by 937
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation
Sommer, S. (2005) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-16 · Cited by 913
MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years?
Bernatchez, L., & Landry, C. (2003) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00531.x · Cited by 890
How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings
Spurgin, L. G., & Richardson, D. S. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2084 · Cited by 745
Wedekind, C., & Füri, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedrick, P. W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 945-964
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2041453228
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.