Cited by 913Genetic diversity and population structureEvolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation

Open access
Sommer, Simone·2005·Frontiers in Zoology

Abstract

Genetic studies have typically inferred the effects of human impact by documenting patterns of genetic differentiation and levels of genetic diversity among potentially isolated populations using selective neutral markers such as mitochondrial control region sequences, microsatellites or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). However, evolutionary relevant and adaptive processes within and between populations can only be reflected by coding genes. In vertebrates, growing evidence suggests that genetic diversity is particularly important at the level of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). MHC variants influence many important biological traits, including immune recognition, susceptibility to infectious and autoimmune diseases, individual odours, mating preferences, kin recognition, cooperation and pregnancy outcome. These diverse functions and characteristics place genes of the MHC among the best candidates for studies of mechanisms and significance of molecular adaptation in vertebrates. MHC variability is believed to be maintained by pathogen-driven selection, mediated either through heterozygote advantage or frequency-dependent selection. Up to now, most of our knowledge has derived from studies in humans or from model organisms under experimental, laboratory conditions. Empirical support for selective mechanisms in free-ranging animal populations in their natural environment is rare. In this review, I first introduce general information about the structure and function of MHC genes, as well as current hypotheses and concepts concerning the role of selection in the maintenance of MHC polymorphism. The evolutionary forces acting on the genetic diversity in coding and non-coding markers are compared. Then, I summarise empirical support for the functional importance of MHC variability in parasite resistance with emphasis on the evidence derived from free-ranging animal populations investigated in their natural habitat. Finally, I discuss the importance of adaptive genetic variability with respect to human impact and conservation, and implications for future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-9994-2-16

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Klein J Horejsi V Immunology 1997 Oxford, Blackwell Science
  2. Marsh SGE Parham P Barber LD The HLA Facts Book 2000 London, Academic Press
  3. Janeway CA Travers P Immunologie 2002 Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH
  4. Hapke A Population genetics and differentiation of species of the genus of mouse lemurs, Microcebus (E. Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1828) and dwarf lemurs, Cheirogaleus (E. Geoffrey St. Hilaire, 1812) in southeastern Madagascar PhD Thesis 2004 University Hamburg, Germany
  5. Rüdel N Consequences of degradation and fragmentation of Malagasy littoral rain forests on gray mouse lemur populations (Microcebus murinus) Diploma Thesis 2004 University Hamburg, Germany

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommer, S.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Sommer, Simone
Venue
Frontiers in Zoology
Published
2005-10-20
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
16-16
ISSN
1742-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098073190
Cited by
913
References
215
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 53
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
major histocompatibility complex, MHC polymorphism, pathogen-driven selection, overdominance, frequency-dependent selection, parasite resistance, adaptive genetic diversity, human impact on wildlife, conservation genetics, free-ranging populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review