The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Causes of Adaptive Radiation
Abstract
According to the naturalists of the first half of this century, adaptive radiation is the outcome of three ecological processes: phenotypic differentiation of populations by resource-based divergent natural selection, phenotypic differentiation through resource competition (ecological opportunity and divergent character displacement), and ecological speciation (speciation as a consequence of adaptation to different resource environments). Despite a recent surge of interest in the phenomenon, especially in phylogenetic histories of radiations, we know too little about the ecology of most radiations to assess the roles of the three processes. I summarize our own efforts to test the theory with a radiation of three-spined sticklebacks apparently still in its early stages. The role of divergent selection is supported by a strong relationship among populations and species in mean morphology, feeding performance, habitat use, and growth rate. Trade-offs in feeding performance and growth rate between habitats are steep. Ecological character displacement is indicated by the large differences between sympatric species and the intermediate features of solitary species inhabiting lakes of similar size. A pond experiment showed that natural selection on a solitary species is altered following introduction of a competitor and favors divergence. Evidence for ecological speciation in sticklebacks is weakest, but there are several hints of its importance: speciation was rapid and accompanied by divergence into different ecological niches; selection against hybrids is stronger in the wild than in the laboratory, which suggests that hybrid fitness depends on ecological context; premating isolation depends in part on traits that diverged in association with the exploitation of different resources; and reproductive isolation may have evolved in parallel in different populations experiencing similar environmental conditions. Comparison with other studies suggests that these findings apply broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Cited by
Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution
Hunter, J. P. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01273-1 · Cited by 340
Speciation and phylogeography in the cosmopolitan marine moon jelly, Aurelia sp
Schroth, W., Jarms, G., Streit, B., & Schierwater, B. (2002) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-2-1 · Cited by 224
Wright, J., Bolstad, G. H., Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12451 · Cited by 175
Evidence for divergent selection between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: role of predation
Diabaté, A., Dabiré, R. K., Heidenberger, K., Crawford, J., Lamp, W. O., Culler, L. E., & Lehmann, T. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-5 · Cited by 136
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Schluter, D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- S40-S64
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1982394538
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Causes of Adaptive Radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285901
- The paper
- Schluter, D. (1996). Ecological Causes of Adaptive Radiation. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.