The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Host-Parasite Coexistence: The Role of Spatial Refuges in Stabilizing Bacteria-Phage Interactions
Abstract
We manipulated a bacteria-phage model system to investigate empirical and theoretical conditions allowing for the coexistence of an Escherichia coli host with each of two virulent phage species, a T1-like phage (T1X) and λvir. In minimal medium in the laboratory, bacteria coexisted with each phage species in continuous (chemostat) culture; however, in serial culture, T1X rapidly became extinct in all cases and λvir became extinct in most cases. When we refined a previously developed mechanistic model of bacteria-phage interactions in continuous culture, this model failed to predict our laboratory observations of long-term stability of bacteria and phage in chemostats. A serial transfer version of this model, however, came much closer to predicting bacteria-phage dynamics. To investigate why models of continuous culture failed, we tested hypotheses for phage persistence by manipulating experimental culture conditions. We found that wall populations of bacteria strongly influenced the stability of both phage species. When wall populations were not allowed to develop in chemostats, both phage species became extinct rapidly; conversely, when wall populations were allowed to develop in serial transfer, both phage species showed evidence of long-term persistence. The final percentage of sensitive bacteria was significantly higher in walls than in liquid populations, suggesting that glass surfaces did indeed act as a spatial refuge for sensitive bacteria. In addition, serial transfer of bacteria and phage on agar surfaces produced more stable interactions than in liquid. We discuss these results in light of previous observations of bacteria-phage interactions and in the broader context of parasite-host and predator-prey coexistence conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Koskella, B., & Brockhurst, M. A. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12072 · Cited by 890
Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage
Buckling, A., & Rainey, P. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1945 · Cited by 638
Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage therapy
Levin, B. R., & Bull, J. J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro822 · Cited by 511
Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology
Jessup, C. M., Kassen, R., Forde, S. E., Kerr, B., Buckling, A., Rainey, P. B., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.008 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Schrag, S. J., & Mittler, J. E.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 348-377
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2069653076
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host-Parasite Coexistence: The Role of Spatial Refuges in Stabilizing Bacteria-Phage Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285929
- The paper
- Schrag, S. J., & Mittler, J. E. (1996). Host-Parasite Coexistence: The Role of Spatial Refuges in Stabilizing Bacteria-Phage Interactions. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.