The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing Pollinator-Mediated Selection in a Plant Hybrid Zone: Hummingbird Visitation Patterns on Three Spatial Scales
Abstract
Clines across hybrid zones can be produced by several forms of natural selection. We illustrate an approach to studying pollinator-mediated selection in plant hybrid zones, using two species of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) as a model system. We measured visitation to flowers in natural and experimental populations by two major types of pollinators, hummingbirds and hawkmoths, at up to three different spatial scales. Using measures of pollinator visitation, we calculated phenotypic selection gradients and characterized the form of selection in the hybrid zone. Hummingbirds overvisited Ipomopsis aggregata compared with Ipomopsis tenuituba and morphological hybrids at all spatial scales, especially the largest scale of kilometers. These responses may depend in part on the presence of other hummingbird-visited plants in the community. Hummingbird behavior produced directional selection favoring wide corolla tubes and intense red coloration. Hawkmoths, in contrast, overvisited plants with narrow corolla tubes. When both types of pollinators were present, corolla width experienced disruptive selection, consistent with a model of hybrid disadvantage. In the natural hybrid zone, however, hawkmoths are rare participants. In most years plants experience visitation from hummingbirds alone. Thus, selection by pollinators usually fits an advancing wave model in which traits characteristic of I. aggregata are favored everywhere. Modeling the evolution of clines in response to such pollinator-mediated selection will require further theoretical development that allows for selection intensity to vary with spatial scale and with the abundance of unrelated plants visited by the same pollinators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers ( Mimulus )
Schemske, D. W., & Bradshaw, H. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910 · Cited by 821
Pollinator-Mediated Selection on Flower Color Allele Drives Reinforcement
Hopkins, R., & Rausher, M. D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215198 · Cited by 274
Aldridge, G., & Campbell, D. R. (2007) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00008.x · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, D. R., Waser, N. M., & Melendez-Ackerman, E. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-315
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2027777578
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Pollinator-Mediated Selection in a Plant Hybrid Zone: Hummingbird Visitation Patterns on Three Spatial Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285991
- The paper
- Campbell, D. R., Waser, N. M., & Melendez-Ackerman, E. J. (1997). Analyzing Pollinator-Mediated Selection in a Plant Hybrid Zone: Hummingbird Visitation Patterns on Three Spatial Scales. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.