Cited by 274Plant and animal studiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Pollinator-Mediated Selection on Flower Color Allele Drives Reinforcement

Hopkins, Robin, Rausher, Mark D.·2012·Science

Abstract

The Constant Pollinator: In ecology, reinforcement is the process by which species prevent hybridization and maintain species boundaries, but the underlying genetic mechanisms are unclear. Hopkins and Rausher (p. 1090 , published online 2 February) examined reinforcement between two species of a wild flowering plant called Phlox that show incomplete hybrid sterility. Down-regulation of a flavonoid gene produces red flowers and operates in concert with a color intensity locus to adjust flower color and tone. A distinct geography of flower color has emerged in which it appears that dark coloration causes less hybridization between the species because the butterfly pollinators tend to favor light-blue flower color variants. If pollinators visit flowers with similar phenotypes more frequently than flowers with dissimilar phenotypes, this will decrease gene flow between the unlike flowers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1215198

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dark-red flower color is favored in populations sympatric with P. cuspidata because pollinator behavior decreases costly hybridization between the two species when they have different flower colors.

    “Dark‐red flower color is favored in populations sympatric with P. cuspidata because pollinator behavior decreases costly hybridization between the two species when they have different flower colors (Hopkins & Rausher, 2012).”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Rausher, 2012

  • Flower color variation across the range of P. drummondii is maintained by pollinator-mediated selection.

    “Previous studies in this system demonstrated that flower color variation across the range of P. drummondii is maintained by pollinator‐mediated selection (Hopkins & Rausher, 2012, 2014).”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Rausher, 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, R., & Rausher, M. D.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, Robin
Venue
Science
Published
2012-03-02
Volume
335
Issue
6072
Pages
1090-1092
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2036370098
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 5
FWCI
28.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
reinforcement, pollinator-mediated selection, flower color, Phlox drummondii, hybrid sterility, interspecific hybridization, pollinator movement, sympatry, speciation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Butterflies, Biological Evolution, Genotype, Hybridization, Genetic, Lepidoptera, Moths, Pigmentation, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Genes, Plant, Magnoliopsida, Flowers, Genetic Speciation, Gene Flow, Pollination, Genetic Fitness, Sympatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review