Pollinator-Mediated Selection on Flower Color Allele Drives Reinforcement
Abstract
The Constant Pollinator: In ecology, reinforcement is the process by which species prevent hybridization and maintain species boundaries, but the underlying genetic mechanisms are unclear. Hopkins and Rausher (p. 1090 , published online 2 February) examined reinforcement between two species of a wild flowering plant called Phlox that show incomplete hybrid sterility. Down-regulation of a flavonoid gene produces red flowers and operates in concert with a color intensity locus to adjust flower color and tone. A distinct geography of flower color has emerged in which it appears that dark coloration causes less hybridization between the species because the butterfly pollinators tend to favor light-blue flower color variants. If pollinators visit flowers with similar phenotypes more frequently than flowers with dissimilar phenotypes, this will decrease gene flow between the unlike flowers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dark-red flower color is favored in populations sympatric with P. cuspidata because pollinator behavior decreases costly hybridization between the two species when they have different flower colors.
“Dark‐red flower color is favored in populations sympatric with P. cuspidata because pollinator behavior decreases costly hybridization between the two species when they have different flower colors (Hopkins & Rausher, 2012).”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Rausher, 2012
Flower color variation across the range of P. drummondii is maintained by pollinator-mediated selection.
“Previous studies in this system demonstrated that flower color variation across the range of P. drummondii is maintained by pollinator‐mediated selection (Hopkins & Rausher, 2012, 2014).”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Rausher, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing for coevolutionary diversification: linking pattern with process
Althoff, D. M., Segraves, K. A., & Johnson, M. T. J. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.11.003 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Streisfeld, M. A., Young, W. N., & Sobel, J. M. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003385 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“This experiment was performed using two Phlox wildflower species that depend on these pollinators for as much as 95% of their pollination visits, suggesting this behavioral variability has important implications for plant evolution.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGenomic analyses overturn two long-standing homoploid hybrid speciation hypotheses
Goulet‐Scott, B. E., Garner, A. G., & Hopkins, R. (2021) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.14279 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hopkins, R., & Rausher, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hopkins, Robin
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-03-02
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 6072
- Pages
- 1090-1092
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2036370098
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- reinforcement, pollinator-mediated selection, flower color, Phlox drummondii, hybrid sterility, interspecific hybridization, pollinator movement, sympatry, speciation
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Animals, Butterflies, Biological Evolution, Genotype, Hybridization, Genetic, Lepidoptera, Moths, Pigmentation, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Genes, Plant, Magnoliopsida, Flowers, Genetic Speciation, Gene Flow, Pollination, Genetic Fitness, Sympatry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review