Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379

Open access
Gebhardt, Karl, Richstone, Douglas, Kormendy, John, Lauer, Tod R., Ajhar, Edward A., Bender, Ralf, Dressler, Alan, Faber, S. M., Grillmair, Carl, Magorrian, John, Tremaine, Scott·2000·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We fit axisymmetric three-integral dynamical models to NGC 3379 using the line-of-sight velocity distribution obtained from Hubble Space Telescope FOS spectra of the galaxy center and ground-based long-slit spectroscopy along four position angles, with the light distribution constrained by WFPC2 and ground-based images. We have fitted models with inclinations from 29° (intrinsic galaxy type E5) to 90° (intrinsic E1) and black hole masses from 0 to 10 9 M ⊙ . The best-fit black hole masses range from 6 × 10 7 to 2 × 10 8 M ⊙ , depending on inclination. The preferred inclination is 90° (edge-on); however, the constraints on allowed inclination are not very strong, owing to our assumption of constant M/L V . The velocity ellipsoid of the best model is not consistent with either isotropy or a two-integral distribution function. Along the major axis, the velocity ellipsoid becomes tangential at the innermost bin, radial in the midrange radii, and tangential again at the outermost bins. The rotation rises quickly at small radii owing to the presence of the black hole. For the acceptable models, the radial-to-tangential [(σ + σ )/2] dispersion in the midrange radii ranges over 1.1 < σ r /σ t < 1.7, with the smaller black holes requiring larger radial anisotropy. Compared with these three-integral models, two-integral isotropic models overestimate the black hole mass since they cannot provide adequate radial motion. However, the models presented in this paper still contain restrictive assumptions—namely, assumptions of constant M/L V and spheroidal symmetry—requiring yet more models to study black hole properties in complete generality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/301240

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Gebhardt, K., Richstone, D., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Ajhar, E. A., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2000-03
Volume
119
Issue
3
Pages
1157-1171
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024486982
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/301240
The paper
Gebhardt, K., Richstone, D., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Ajhar, E. A., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S. (2000). Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/301240

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.