The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379
Open accessAbstract
We fit axisymmetric three-integral dynamical models to NGC 3379 using the line-of-sight velocity distribution obtained from Hubble Space Telescope FOS spectra of the galaxy center and ground-based long-slit spectroscopy along four position angles, with the light distribution constrained by WFPC2 and ground-based images. We have fitted models with inclinations from 29° (intrinsic galaxy type E5) to 90° (intrinsic E1) and black hole masses from 0 to 10 9 M ⊙ . The best-fit black hole masses range from 6 × 10 7 to 2 × 10 8 M ⊙ , depending on inclination. The preferred inclination is 90° (edge-on); however, the constraints on allowed inclination are not very strong, owing to our assumption of constant M/L V . The velocity ellipsoid of the best model is not consistent with either isotropy or a two-integral distribution function. Along the major axis, the velocity ellipsoid becomes tangential at the innermost bin, radial in the midrange radii, and tangential again at the outermost bins. The rotation rises quickly at small radii owing to the presence of the black hole. For the acceptable models, the radial-to-tangential [(σ + σ )/2] dispersion in the midrange radii ranges over 1.1 < σ r /σ t < 1.7, with the smaller black holes requiring larger radial anisotropy. Compared with these three-integral models, two-integral isotropic models overestimate the black hole mass since they cannot provide adequate radial motion. However, the models presented in this paper still contain restrictive assumptions—namely, assumptions of constant M/L V and spheroidal symmetry—requiring yet more models to study black hole properties in complete generality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER
Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/198 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationCappellari, M., Scott, N., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., Bois, M., Bournaud, F., Bureau, M., Crocker, A. F., Davies, R. L., Davis, T. A., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt562 · Cited by 734
Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M., Peletier, R. F., McDermid, R. M., Bacon, R., Bureau, M., Copin, Y., Davies, R. L., Krajnović, D., Kuntschner, H., et al. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07948.x · Cited by 474
THE BLACK HOLE MASS IN M87 FROM GEMINI/NIFS ADAPTIVE OPTICS OBSERVATIONS
Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., Lauer, T. R., Faber, S. M., Gültekin, K., Murphy, J., & Tremaine, S. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/119 · Cited by 466
Self-citationOn the Relationship between Radio Emission and Black Hole Mass in Galactic Nuclei
Ho, L. C. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/324399 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebhardt, K., Richstone, D., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Ajhar, E. A., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1157-1171
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024486982
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/301240
- The paper
- Gebhardt, K., Richstone, D., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Ajhar, E. A., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S. (2000). Axisymmetric, Three-Integral Models of Galaxies: A Massive Black Hole in NGC 3379. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/301240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.