The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER
Open accessAbstract
We derive improved versions of the relations between supermassive black hole mass ( M BH ) and host-galaxy bulge velocity dispersion (σ) and luminosity ( L ; the M –σ and M – L relations), based on 49 M BH measurements and 19 upper limits. Particular attention is paid to recovery of the intrinsic scatter ( 0 ) in both relations. We find log( M BH / M ☉ ) = α + βlog(σ/200 km s −1 ) with (α, β, 0 ) = (8.12 ± 0.08, 4.24 ± 0.41, 0.44 ± 0.06) for all galaxies and (α, β, 0 ) = (8.23 ± 0.08, 3.96 ± 0.42, 0.31 ± 0.06) for ellipticals. The results for ellipticals are consistent with previous studies, but the intrinsic scatter recovered for spirals is significantly larger. The scatter inferred reinforces the need for its consideration when calculating local black hole mass function based on the M –σ relation, and further implies that there may be substantial selection bias in studies of the evolution of the M –σ relation. We estimate the M – L relationship as log( M BH / M ☉ ) = α + βlog( L V /10 11 L ☉, V ) of (α, β, 0 ) = (8.95 ± 0.11, 1.11 ± 0.18, 0.38 ± 0.09); using only early-type galaxies. These results appear to be insensitive to a wide range of assumptions about the measurement errors and the distribution of intrinsic scatter. We show that culling the sample according to the resolution of the black hole's sphere of influence biases the relations to larger mean masses, larger slopes, and incorrect intrinsic residuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bender, R., Kormendy, J., Bower, G., Green, R., Thomas, J., Danks, A. C., Gull, T., Hutchings, J. B., Joseph, C. L., Kaiser, M. E., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/432434 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Cited by
The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster
Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 · Cited by 1,236
Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y · Cited by 609
THE BLACK HOLE MASS IN M87 FROM GEMINI/NIFS ADAPTIVE OPTICS OBSERVATIONS
Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., Lauer, T. R., Faber, S. M., Gültekin, K., Murphy, J., & Tremaine, S. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/119 · Cited by 466
Self-citationEDDINGTON-LIMITED ACCRETION AND THE BLACK HOLE MASS FUNCTION AT REDSHIFT 6
Willott, C. J., Albert, L., Arzoumanian, D., Bergeron, J., Crampton, D., Delorme, P., Hutchings, J. B., Omont, A., Reylé, C., & Schade, D. (2010) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/546 · Cited by 349
Harris, W. E., Harris, G. L. H., & Alessi, M. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/82 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Siopis, C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-05-19
- Volume
- 698
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 198-221
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1980547824
- Cited by
- 1,533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 58.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/198
- The paper
- Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Siopis, C. (2009). THE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.