The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Progenitor Masses of Wolf-Rayet Stars and Luminous Blue Variables Determined from Cluster Turnoffs. I. Results from 19 OB Associations in the Magellanic Clouds
Open accessAbstract
We combine new CCD UBV photometry and spectroscopy with those from the literature to investigate 19 Magellanic Cloud OB associations that contain Wolf-Rayet (W-R) and other types of evolved, massive stars. Our spectroscopy reveals a wealth of newly identified interesting objects, including early O-type supergiants, a high-mass, double-lined binary in the SMC, and, in the LMC, a newly confirmed luminous blue variable (LBV; R85), a newly discovered W-R star (Sk -69°194), and a newly found luminous B[e] star (LH 85-10). We use these data to provide precise reddening determinations and construct physical H-R diagrams for the associations. We find that about half of the associations may be highly coeval, with the massive stars having formed over a short period (Δτ < 1 Myr). The (initial) masses of the highest mass unevolved stars in the coeval clusters may be used to estimate the masses of the progenitors of W-R and other evolved stars found in these clusters. Similarly, the bolometric luminosities of the highest mass unevolved stars can be used to determine the bolometric corrections (BCs) for the evolved stars, providing a valuable observational basis for evaluating recent models of these complicated atmospheres. What we find is the following: (1) Although their numbers is small, it appears that the W-R stars in the SMC come from only the highest mass (greater than 70 M ⊙ ) stars. This is in accord with our expectations that at low metallicities only the most massive and luminous stars will have sufficient mass loss to become W-R stars. (2) In the LMC, the early-type WN (WNE) stars occur in clusters whose turnoff masses range from 30 to 100 M ⊙ or more. This suggests that possibly all stars with mass greater than 30 M ⊙ pass through a WNE stage at LMC metallicities. (3) The one WC star in the SMC is found in a cluster with a turnoff mass of 70 M ⊙ , the same as that for the SMC WN stars. In the LMC, the WC stars are found in clusters with turnoff masses of 45 M ⊙ or higher, similar to what is found for the LMC WN stars. Thus we conclude that WC stars come from essentially the same mass range as do WN stars and indeed are often found in the same clusters. This has important implications for interpreting the relationship between metallicity and the WC/WN ratio found in Local Group galaxies, which we discuss. (4) The LBVs in our sample come from very high mass stars (greater than 85 M ⊙ ), similar to what is known for the Galactic LBV η Car, suggesting that only the most massive stars go through an LBV phase. Recently, Ofpe/WN9 stars have been implicated as LBVs after one such star underwent an LBV-like outburst. However, our study includes two Ofpe/WN9 stars, BE 381 and Br 18, which we find in clusters with much lower turnoff masses (25–35 M ⊙ ). We suggest that Ofpe/WN9 stars are unrelated to "true" LBVs: not all "LBV-like outbursts" may have the same cause. Similarly, the B[e] stars have sometimes been described as LBV-like. Yet, the two stars in our sample appear to come from a large mass range (30–60 M ⊙ ). This is consistent with other studies, suggesting that B[e] stars cover a large range in bolometric luminosities. (5) The bolometric corrections of early WN and WC stars are found to be extreme, with an average BC(WNE) of -6.0 mag and an average BC(WC4) of -5.5 mag. These values are considerably more negative than those of even the hottest O-type stars. However, similar values have been found for WNE stars by applying Hillier's "standard model" for W-R atmospheres. We find more modest BCs for the Ofpe/WN9 stars (BC = -2 to -4 mag), also consistent with recent analysis done with the standard model. Extension of these studies to the Galactic clusters will provide insight into how massive stars evolve at different metallicities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
“…of relatively rapid rotation (Georgy et al. 2012).6 At first glance, models and observations would seem to be reasonably well aligned (Massey 2003): MWR is inferred to be about 25 M⊙ at Z⊙ (Crowther 2007), increasing to about 30 and 70 M⊙ at ZLMC and ZSMC , respectively (Massey et al. 2000).”
BackgroundChemical enrichment by Wolf--Rayet and asymptotic giant branch stars
Dray, L. M., Tout, C. A., Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06142.x · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Massey, P., Waterhouse, E., & DeGioia-Eastwood, K.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2214-2241
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085211109
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Progenitor Masses of Wolf-Rayet Stars and Luminous Blue Variables Determined from Cluster Turnoffs. I. Results from 19 OB Associations in the Magellanic Clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/301345
- The paper
- Massey, P., Waterhouse, E., & DeGioia-Eastwood, K. (2000). The Progenitor Masses of Wolf-Rayet Stars and Luminous Blue Variables Determined from Cluster Turnoffs. I. Results from 19 OB Associations in the Magellanic Clouds. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/301345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.