Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,037

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer Families

Open access
Ford, D., Easton, D.F., Stratton, M., Narod, S., Goldgar, D., Devilee, P., Bishop, D.T., Weber, B., Lenoir, G., Chang-Claude, J., Sobol, H., Teare, M.D., Struewing, J., Arason, A., Scherneck, S., Peto, J., Rebbeck, T.R., Tonin, P., Neuhausen, S., Barkardottir, R., Eyfjord, J., Lynch, H., Ponder, B.A.J., Gayther, S.A., Birch, J.M., Lindblom, A., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bignon, Y., Borg, A., Hamann, U., Haites, N., Scott, R.J., Maugard, C.M., Vasen, H., Seitz, S., Cannon-Albright, L.A., Schofield, A., Zelada-Hedman, M.·1998·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to inherited breast cancer was assessed by linkage and mutation analysis in 237 families, each with at least four cases of breast cancer, collected by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Families were included without regard to the occurrence of ovarian or other cancers. Overall, disease was linked to BRCA1 in an estimated 52% of families, to BRCA2 in 32% of families, and to neither gene in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-28%), suggesting other predisposition genes. The majority (81%) of the breast-ovarian cancer families were due to BRCA1, with most others (14%) due to BRCA2. Conversely, the majority of families with male and female breast cancer were due to BRCA2 (76%). The largest proportion (67%) of families due to other genes was found in families with four or five cases of female breast cancer only. These estimates were not substantially affected either by changing the assumed penetrance model for BRCA1 or by including or excluding BRCA1 mutation data. Among those families with disease due to BRCA1 that were tested by one of the standard screening methods, mutations were detected in the coding sequence or splice sites in an estimated 63% (95% CI 51%-77%). The estimated sensitivity was identical for direct sequencing and other techniques. The penetrance of BRCA2 was estimated by maximizing the LOD score in BRCA2-mutation families, over all possible penetrance functions. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer reached 28% (95% CI 9%-44%) by age 50 years and 84% (95% CI 43%-95%) by age 70 years. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 0.4% (95% CI 0%-1%) by age 50 years and 27% (95% CI 0%-47%) by age 70 years. The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in BRCA2 carriers <50 years of age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/301749

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers

    FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850 · cited 1×

    “The risks conferred by BRCA1 have been estimated both from linkage data (Easton et al. 1995) and from the study of cancer incidence in carriers within families with disease believed to be linked to the gene (Ford et al. 1994).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Bowcock, 1993, THRA1 and D17S183 flank an interval of <4 cM for the breast-ovarian cancer gene (BRCA1) on chromosome 17q21, Am J Hum Genet, 52, 718
  2. Claus, 1991, Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, Am J Hum Genet, 48, 232
  3. Claus, 1993, Analysis of the genetic relationship between breast and ovarian cancer, Am J Hum Genet, 787
  4. Cottingham, 1993, Faster sequential genetic linkage computations, Am J Hum Genet, 53, 252
  5. Easton, 1993, Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families, Am J Hum Genet, 52, 678
  6. Easton, 1995, Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers, Am J Hum Genet, 56, 265
  7. Easton, 1997, Cancer risks in two large breast cancer families linked to BRCA2 on chromosome 13q12-13, Am J Hum Genet, 61, 120, 10.1086/513891 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Elston, 1995, Twixt cup and lip: how intractable is the ascertainment problem?, Am J Hum Genet, 56, 15
  9. Ganguly, 1993, Confirmation sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single base differences in double stranded PCR products and DNA fragments—evidence for solvent induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90, 10325, 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10325 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gayther, 1996, Rpaid detection of regionally clustered germ-line BRCA1 mutations by multiple heteroduplex analysis, Am J Hum Genet, 58, 451
  11. Gayther, 1997, Variation of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene, Nat Genet, 15, 103, 10.1038/ng0197-103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gayther, 1995, Germline mutations of the BRCA1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer families provide evidence for a genotype-phenotype correlation, Nat Genet, 11, 428, 10.1038/ng1295-428 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gyapay, 1994, The 1993–94 Généthon human genetic linkage map, Nat Genet, 7, 246, 10.1038/ng0694supp-246 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Håkansson, 1997, Moderate frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations in Scandinavian familial breast cancer, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1068
  15. Hall, 1992, Closing in on a breast cancer gene on chromosome 17q, Am J Hum Genet, 50, 1235
  16. Hall, 1990, Linkage of early onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21, Science, 250, 1684, 10.1126/science.2270482 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hemmenki, 1997, Localization of a susceptibility locus for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome to 19p using comparative genomic hybridization and targeted linkage analysis, Nat Genet, 15, 87, 10.1038/ng0197-87 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hogervorst, 1995, Rapid detection of BRCA1 mutations by the protein truncation test, Nat Genet, 10, 208, 10.1038/ng0695-208 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Holt, 1996, Growth retardation and tumour inhibition, Nat Genet, 12, 298, 10.1038/ng0396-298 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kerangueven, 1995, Loss of heterozygosity and linkage analysis in breast-carcinoma—indication for a putative 3rd susceptibility gene on the short arm of chromosome 8, Oncogene, 10, 1023
  21. Lathrop, 1984, Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 81, 3443, 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3443 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liaw, 1997, Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome, Nat Genet, 16, 64, 10.1038/ng0597-64 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Miki, 1994, Isolation of BRCA1, the 17q-linked breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, Science, 266, 66, 10.1126/science.7545954 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Narod, 1995, Genetic heterogeneity of breast-ovarian cancer revisited., Am J Hum Genet, 57, 957
  25. Narod, 1995, An evaluation of genetic heterogeneity in 145 breast-ovarian cancer families, Am J Hum Genet, 56, 254
  26. Peelen, 1997, A high proportion of novel mutations in BRCA1 with strong founder effects among Dutch and Belgian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1041
  27. Phelan, 1996, Mutation analysis of the BRCA2 gene in 49 site-specific breast cancer families, Nat Genet, 13, 120, 10.1038/ng0596-120 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schubert, 1997, BRCA2 in American families with four or more cases of breast or ovarian cancer: recurrent and novel mutations, variable expression, penetrance, and the possibility of families whose cancer is not attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1031
  29. Seitz, 1997, Strong indication for a breast cancer susceptibility gene on chromosome 8p12-p22: linkage analysis in German breast cancer families, Oncogene, 14, 741, 10.1038/sj.onc.1200881 · DOI
  30. Serova, 1997, Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: are there more breast cancer–susceptibility genes?, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 486
  31. Stoppa-Lyonnet, 1997, BRCA1 sequence variations in 160 individuals referred to a breast/ovarian family cancer clinic, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1021
  32. Stratton, 1994, Familial male breast cancer is not linked to BRCA1, Nat Genet, 7, 103, 10.1038/ng0594-103 · DOI
  33. Struewing, 1997, The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews, N Engl J Med, 336, 1401, 10.1056/NEJM199705153362001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Tavtigian, 1996, The complete BRCA2 gene and mutations in 13q-linked kindreds, Nat Genet, 12, 333, 10.1038/ng0396-333 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tulinius, 1992, Risk of prostate, ovarian and endometrial cancer among relatives of women with breast cancer, Br Med J, 305, 855, 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.855 · DOI
  36. Weber, 1990, Dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms at the D17S250 and D17S261 loci, Nucleic Acids Res, 18, 464
  37. Wooster, 1995, Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2, Nature, 378, 789, 10.1038/378789a0 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Wooster, 1994, Localisation of a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA2) to chromosome 13q by genetic linkage analysis, Science, 265, 2088, 10.1126/science.8091231 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 3,037

Metadata

Authors
Ford, D., Easton, D. F., Stratton, M., Narod, S., Goldgar, D., Devilee, P., Bishop, D. T., Weber, B., Lenoir, G., Chang-Claude, J., Sobol, H., Teare, M. D., Struewing, J., Arason, A., Scherneck, S., Peto, J., Rebbeck, T. R., Tonin, P., Neuhausen, S., Barkardottir, R., Eyfjord, J., Lynch, H., Ponder, B. A. J., Gayther, S. A., Birch, J. M., Lindblom, A., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bignon, Y., Borg, A., Hamann, U., Haites, N., Scott, R. J., Maugard, C. M., Vasen, H., Seitz, S., Cannon-Albright, L. A., Schofield, A., & Zelada-Hedman, M.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
676-689
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103970959
Cited by
3,037
References
1
FWCI
77.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.