The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specific Hypotheses on the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution
Abstract
Coevolution is one of the major processes organizing the earth's biodiversity. The need to understand coevolution as an ongoing process has grown as ecological concerns have risen over the dynamics of rapidly changing biological communities, the conservation of genetic diversity, and the population biology of diseases. The biggest current challenge is to understand how coevolution operates across broad geographic landscapes, linking local ecological processes with phylogeographic patterns. The geographic mosaic theory of coevolution provides a framework for asking how coevolution continually reshapes interactions across different spatial and temporal scales. It produces specific hypotheses on how geographically structured coevolution differs from coevolution at the local scale. It also provides a framework for understanding how local maladaptation can result from coevolution and why coevolved interactions may rarely produce long lists of coevolved traits that become fixed within species. Long‐term field studies of the same interaction across multiple communities and spatially structured mathematical models are together beginning to show that coevolution may be a more important ongoing process than had been indicated by earlier empirical and theoretical studies lacking a geographic perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
Population Diversity: Its Extent and Extinction
Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.689 · Cited by 596
Cited by
Brodie, E. D., Ridenhour, B. J., & Brodie, E. D. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00132.x · Cited by 365
Ehrlich and Raven revisited: mechanisms underlying codiversification of plants and enemies
Janz, N. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145024 · Cited by 234
The Fossil Record of Predator-Prey Arms Races: Coevolution and Escalation Hypotheses
Dietl, G. P., & Kelley, P. H. (2002) · The Paleontological Society Papers · doi:10.1017/s1089332600001157 · Cited by 79
Corby‐Harris, V., & Promislow, D. E. L. (2008) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01399.x · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, J. N.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- S1-S14
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2071357982
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific Hypotheses on the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303208
- The paper
- Thompson, J. N. (1999). Specific Hypotheses on the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.