The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities
Abstract
I examine, through an extensive compilation of published reports, the nature and variability of carbon flow (i.e., primary production, herbivory, detrital production, decomposition, export, and biomass and detrital storage) in a range of aquatic and terrestrial plant communities. Communities composed of more nutritional plants (i.e., higher nutrient concentrations) lose higher percentages of production to herbivores, channel lower percentages as detritus, experience faster decomposition rates, and, as a result, store smaller carbon pools. These results suggest plant palatability as a main limiting factor of consumer metabolical and feeding rates across communities. Hence, across communities, plant nutritional quality may be regarded as a descriptor of the importance of herbivore control on plant biomass ("top-down" control), the rapidity of nutrient and energy recycling, and the magnitude of carbon storage. These results contribute to an understanding of how much and why the trophic routes of carbon flow, and their ecological implications, vary across plant communities. They also offer a basis to predict the effects of widespread enhancement of plant nutritional quality due to large-scale anthropogenic eutrophication on carbon balances in ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes
Duarte, C. M. (1995) · Ophelia · doi:10.1080/00785236.1995.10422039 · Cited by 924
Forest Litter Decomposition in Relation to Soil Nitrogen Dynamics and Litter Quality
McClaugherty, C. A., Pastor, J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941327 · Cited by 593
Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems
Cyr, H., & Pace, M. L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361148a0 · Cited by 528
Cited by
TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGY
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M., & West, G. B. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-9000 · Cited by 7,779
Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., Dobberfuhl, D. R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., Interlandi, S., Kilham, S. S., McCauley, E., Schulz, K. L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046058 · Cited by 1,645
Gessner, M. O., Swan, C. M., Dang, C. K., McKie, B. G., Bardgett, R. D., Wall, D. H., & Hättenschwiler, S. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010 · Cited by 1,335
Vergés, A., Steinberg, P. D., Hay, M. E., Poore, A. G. B., Campbell, A. H., Ballesteros, E., Heck, K. L., Booth, D. J., Coleman, M. A., Feary, D. A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0846 · Cited by 1,021
A cross‐ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades
Shurin, J. B., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., Anderson, K., Blanchette, C. A., Broitman, B., Cooper, S. D., & Halpern, B. S. (2002) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00381.x · Cited by 973
Metadata
- Authors
- Cebrian, J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-468
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2082008228
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303244
- The paper
- Cebrian, J. (1999). Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.