The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability in Nature
Abstract
The observation that traits closely related to fitness (“fitness traits”) have lower heritabilities than traits more distantly associated with fitness has traditionally been framed in terms of Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—fitness traits are expected to have low levels of additive genetic variance due to rapid fixation of alleles conferring highest fitness. Subsequent treatments have challenged this view by pointing out that high environmental and nonadditive genetic contributions to phenotypic variation may also explain the low heritability of fitness traits. Analysis of a large data set from the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis confirmed a previous finding that traits closely associated with fitness tend to have lower heritability. However, analysis of coefficients of additive genetic variation (CVA) revealed that traits closely associated with fitness had higher levels of additive genetic variation (VA) than traits more distantly associated with fitness. Hence, the negative relationship between a trait’s association with fitness and its heritability was not due to lower levels of VA in fitness traits but was due to their higher residual variance. However, whether the high residual variance was mainly due to higher levels of environmental variance or due to higher levels of nonadditive genetic variance remains a challenge to be addressed by further studies. Our results are consistent with earlier suggestions that fitness‐related traits may have more complex genetic architecture than traits more distantly associated with fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686 · cited 1×
“All rights reserved. considerable controversy in evolutionary biology during the past 2 decades (e.g., Gustafsson 1986; Charlesworth 1987; Jones 1987; Barton and Turelli 1989; Kirkpatrick and Ryan 1991; Burt 1995; Merilä and Sheldon 1999).”
Background
Cited by
Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study
Kirk, K. M., Blomberg, S. P., Duffy, D. L., Heath, A. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Martin, N. G. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01304.x · Cited by 245
Barton, N. H. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2009.74.030 · Cited by 68
The fundamental theorem of natural selection with mutations
Basener, W. F., & Sanford, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-017-1190-x · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Merilä, J., & Sheldon, B. C.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-310
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1990706119
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.