The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities
Abstract
The patterns of abundance generated by a simple stochastic birth-death-immigration model are described in order to characterize the diversity of neutral communities of ecologically equivalent species. Diversity is described by species number S and the variance of frequency or log abundance q∼. The frequency distribution of abundance is very generally lognormal, skewed to the left by immigration and resembling descriptions of natural communities. Increased immigration and community size always cause S to increase. Their effect on q∼ is more complicated, but given biologically reasonable assumptions, S and q∼ will be positively correlated in most circumstances. Larger samples contain more species; the graph of log S on log individuals, equivalent to a species-area curve, is generally convex upward but becomes linear with a slope of about +0.25 when immigration is low and births exceed deaths. When individuals invade a new, vacant environment, both S and q∼ increase through time. Thus, a positive correlation between S and q∼ will usually be generated when sites of differing size or age are surveyed. At equilibrium, communities maintain roughly constant levels of S and q∼ but change in composition through time; composition may remain similar, however, for many generations. Many prominent patterns observed in natural communities can therefore be generated by a strictly neutral model. This does not show that community structure is determined exclusively by demographic stochasticity, but rather demonstrates the necessity for an appropriate null model when functional hypotheses are being tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050
Seebens, H., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Capinha, C., Dawson, W., Dullinger, S., Genovesi, P., Hulme, P. E., van Kleunen, M., Kühn, I., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15333 · Cited by 722
Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community
Ofiţeru, I. D., Lunn, M., Curtis, T. P., Wells, G. F., Criddle, C. S., Francis, C. A., & Sloan, W. T. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000604107 · Cited by 580
THOMPSON, R., & TOWNSEND, C. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01068.x · Cited by 370
Null Versus Neutral Models: What's The Difference?
Gotelli, N. J., & McGill, B. J. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04714.x · Cited by 284
Effects of Productivity and Disturbance on Species Richness: A Neutral Model
Kadmon, R., & Benjamini, Y. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/504602 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 606-617
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1967386539
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303345
- The paper
- Bell, G. (2000). The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.