The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More Satellites of Spiral Galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We present a revised and expanded catalog of satellite galaxies of a set of isolated spiral galaxies similar in luminosity to the Milky Way. This sample of 115 satellites, 69 of which were discovered in our multifiber redshift survey, is used to probe the results obtained from the original sample further (Zaritsky et al.). The satellites are, by definition, at projected separations ≲500 kpc, have absolute recessional velocity differences with respect to the parent spiral of less than 500 km s -1 , and are at least 2.2 mag fainter than their associated primary galaxy. A key characteristic of this survey is the strict isolation of these systems, which simplifies any dynamical analysis. We find no evidence for a decrease in the velocity dispersion of the satellite system as a function of radius out to galactocentric radii of 400 kpc, which suggests that the halo extends well beyond 200 kpc. Furthermore, the new sample affirms our previous conclusions (Zaritsky et al.) that (1) the velocity difference between a satellite and its primary is not strongly correlated with the rotation speed of the primary, (2) the system of satellites has a slight net rotation (34 ± 14 km s -1 ) in the same sense as the primary's disk, and (3) that the halo mass of an ~ L * spiral galaxy is in excess of 2 × 10 12 M ☉ .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×
“Given the recent results from simulations on the behavior of disks and halos, the lack of a strong signal is not as surprising as it once was and may be consistent with the parameterization of halo rotation curves found by Navarro et al. (1996).”
ResultSelf-citation
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?
Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307643 · Cited by 2,741
The Updated Zwicky Catalog (UZC)
Falco, E. E., Kurtz, M. J., Geller, M. J., Huchra, J. P., Peters, J., Berlind, P., Mink, D. J., Tokarz, S. P., & Elwell, B. (1999) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/316343 · Cited by 473
A Search for Extended Ultraviolet Disk (XUV‐Disk) Galaxies in the Local Universe
Thilker, D. A., Bianchi, L., Meurer, G., Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., Madore, B. F., Boselli, A., Ferguson, A. M. N., Muńoz‐Mateos, J. C., Madsen, G. J., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/523853 · Cited by 373
Testing the Dark Matter Hypothesis with Low Surface Brightness Galaxies and Other Evidence
McGaugh, S. S., & de Blok, W. J. G. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305612 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C., & White, S. D. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-03-20
- Volume
- 478
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-48
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2038040928
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Satellites of Spiral Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303784
- The paper
- Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C., & White, S. D. M. (1997). More Satellites of Spiral Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/303784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.