The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?
Open accessAbstract
According to the hierarchical clustering scenario, galaxies are assembled by merging and accretion of numerous satellites of different sizes and masses. This ongoing process is not 100% efficient in destroying all of the accreted satellites, as evidenced by the satellites of our Galaxy and of M31. Using published data, we have compiled the circular velocity ( V circ ) distribution function (VDF) of galaxy satellites in the Local Group. We find that within the volumes of radius of 570 kpc (400 h -1 kpc assuming the Hubble constant h = 0.7) centered on the Milky Way and Andromeda, the average VDF is roughly approximated as n (> V circ ) ≈ 55 ± 11( V circ /10 km s -1 ) -1.4±0.4 h 3 Mpc -3 for V circ in the range ≈10-70 km s -1 . The observed VDF is compared with results of high-resolution cosmological simulations. We find that the VDF in models is very different from the observed one: n (> V circ ) ≈ 1200( V circ /10 km s -1 ) -2.75 h 3 Mpc -3 . Cosmological models thus predict that a halo the size of our Galaxy should have about 50 dark matter satellites with circular velocity greater than 20 km s -1 and mass greater than 3 × 10 8 M ☉ within a 570 kpc radius. This number is significantly higher than the approximately dozen satellites actually observed around our Galaxy. The difference is even larger if we consider the abundance of satellites in simulated galaxy groups similar to the Local Group. The models predict ~300 satellites inside a 1.5 Mpc radius, while only ~40 satellites are observed in the Local Group. The observed and predicted VDFs cross at ≈50 km s -1 , indicating that the predicted abundance of satellites with V circ ≳ 50 km s -1 is in reasonably good agreement with observations. We conclude, therefore, that unless a large fraction of the Local Group satellites has been missed in observations, there is a dramatic discrepancy between observations and hierarchical models, regardless of the model parameters. We discuss several possible explanations for this discrepancy including identification of some satellites with the high-velocity clouds observed in the Local Group and the existence of dark satellites that failed to accrete gas and form stars either because of the expulsion of gas in the supernovae-driven winds or because of gas heating by the intergalactic ionizing background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical ClusteringPreprint
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · Cited by 6,275
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
DWARF GALAXIES OF THE LOCAL GROUP
Mateo, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 · Cited by 2,362
The origin of dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation
Dekel, A., & Silk, J. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164050 · Cited by 1,919
The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes*
Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., & Guiderdoni, B. (1993) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.201 · Cited by 1,884
Starburst‐driven Mass Loss from Dwarf Galaxies: Efficiency and Metal Ejection
Mac Low, M., & Ferrara, A. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306832 · Cited by 986
The Bell Laboratories H I survey
Stark, A. A., Gammie, C. F., Wilson, R. W., Bally, J., Linke, R. A., Heiles, C., & Hurwitz, M. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/191645 · Cited by 842
Suppressing the formation of dwarf galaxies via photoionization
Efstathiou, G. (1992) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/256.1.43p · Cited by 738
Adaptive Refinement Tree: A New High‐Resolution N‐Body Code for Cosmological Simulations
Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., & Khokhlov, A. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313015 · Cited by 669
Self-citation
Cited by
Observational Evidence for Self-Interacting Cold Dark Matter
Spergel, D. N., & Steinhardt, P. J. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.3760 · Cited by 2,097
The New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 · Cited by 1,160
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Clowe, D., Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Murray, S., & Tucker, W. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383178 · Cited by 942
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Metadata
- Authors
- Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 522
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2139031955
- Cited by
- 2,741
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 60.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307643
- The paper
- Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. (1999). Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites? The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.