The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background
Open accessAbstract
Polarization induced by cosmological scalar perturbations leads to a typical anisotropy pattern, which can best be analyzed in a Fourier domain. This allows one to distinguish a cosmological signal of polarization unambiguously from other foregrounds and systematics, as well as from polarization induced by nonscalar perturbations. The precision with which polarization and cross-correlation power spectra can be determined is limited by cosmic variance, noise, and foreground residuals. The choice of estimator can significantly improve our capability of extracting a cosmological signal, and in the noise-dominated limit the optimal power spectrum estimator reduces the variance by a factor of 2 compared to the simplest estimator. If foreground residuals are important, then a different estimator can be used, which eliminates systematic effects from foregrounds so that no further foreground subtraction is needed. A particular combination of Stokes Q and U parameters vanishes for scalar-induced polarization, thereby allowing a direct determination of tensor modes. Theoretical predictions of polarization in standard models show that one typically expects a signal at the level of 5-10 μK on small angular scales and around 1 μK on large scales ( l < 200). Satellite missions should be able to reach sensitivities needed for an unambiguous detection of polarization, which would help to break the degeneracies in the determination of some of the cosmological parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787
Planck 2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 · Cited by 1,635
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Polarization Analysis
Page, L., Hinshaw, G., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Barnes, C., Bean, R., Dore, O., Dunkley, J., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513699 · Cited by 1,380
Ade, P. A. R., Ahmed, Z., Amiri, M., Barkats, D., Thakur, R. B., Bischoff, C. A., Beck, D., Bock, J. J., Boenish, H., Bullock, E., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.151301 · Cited by 1,014
Joint Analysis of BICEP2/ Keck Array and Planck Data
Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Ahmed, Z., Aikin, R. W., Alexander, K. D., Arnaud, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barkats, D., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.101301 · Cited by 1,013
Metadata
- Authors
- Seljak, U.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-06-10
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-16
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2012728681
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/304123
- The paper
- Seljak, U. (1997). Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/304123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.