The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Evidence for a Black Hole in M32 from HST/FOS Spectra. II. Axisymmetric Dynamical Models
Open accessAbstract
Axisymmetric dynamical models are constructed for the E3 galaxy M32 to interpret high spatial resolution stellar kinematical data obtained with the Hubble Space T elescope ( HST ). Models are studied with two-integral, f ( E , L z ), phase-space distribution functions and with fully general three-integral distribution functions. The latter are built using an extension of Schwarzschild's approach: individual orbits in the axisymmetric potential are calculated numerically, and populated using nonnegative least-squares fitting so as to reproduce all available kinematical data, including line-of-sight velocity profile shapes. The details of this method are described in companion papers by Rix et al. and Cretton et al. Models are constructed for inclinations i = 90° (edge on) and i = 55°. No model without a nuclear dark object can fit the combined ground-based and HST data, independent of the dynamical structure of M32. Models with a nuclear dark object of mass M • = 3.4 × 10 6 M ☉ (with 1 σ and 3 σ error bars of 0.7 × 10 6 M ☉ and 1.6 × 10 6 M ☉ , respectively) do provide an excellent fit. The inclined models provide the best fit, but the inferred M • does not depend sensitively on the assumed inclination. The models that best fit the data are not two-integral models, but like two-integral models they are azimuthally anisotropic. Two-integral models therefore provide useful low-order approximations to the dynamical structure of M32. We use them to show that an extended dark object can fit the data only if its half-mass radius is r h ≲ 0 08 (=0.26 pc), implying a central dark matter density exceeding 1 × 10 8 M ☉ pc -3 . The inferred M • is consistent with that suggested previously by ground-based kinematical data. However, radially anisotropic axisymmetric constant mass-to-light ratio models are now ruled out for the first time, and the limit on the dark matter density implied by the HST data is now stringent enough to rule out most plausible alternatives to a massive black hole. The dynamically inferred M • is identical to that suggested by existing models for HST photometry of M32 that assume adiabatic growth (over a timescale exceeding 10 6 yr) of a black hole into a preexisting core. The low activity of the nucleus of M32 implies either that only a very small fraction of the gas that is shed by evolving stars is accreted onto the black hole or, alternatively, that accretion proceeds at very low efficiency, e.g., in an advection-dominated mode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176343 · Cited by 1,679
Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106–108 solar masses in nearby galaxies
Rees, M. J. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333523a0 · Cited by 1,673
Cited by
A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies
Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312838 · Cited by 4,417
The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/341002 · Cited by 2,617
Cappellari, M., Scott, N., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., Bois, M., Bournaud, F., Bureau, M., Crocker, A. F., Davies, R. L., Davis, T. A., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt562 · Cited by 734
Self-citationThe SAURON project — II. Sample and early results
Tim de Zeeuw, P., Bureau, M., Emsellem, E., Bacon, R., Marcella Carollo, C., Copin, Y., Davies, R. L., Kuntschner, H., Miller, B. W., Monnet, G., et al. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05059.x · Cited by 565
Cappellari, M. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13754.x · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Marel, R. P., Cretton, N., de Zeeuw, P. T., & Rix, H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 493
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 613-631
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1967322575
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Evidence for a Black Hole in M32 from HST/FOS Spectra. II. Axisymmetric Dynamical Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305147
- The paper
- van der Marel, R. P., Cretton, N., de Zeeuw, P. T., & Rix, H. (1998). Improved Evidence for a Black Hole in M32 from HST/FOS Spectra. II. Axisymmetric Dynamical Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.