Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,617

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation

Open access
Tremaine, Scott, Gebhardt, Karl, Bender, Ralf, Bower, Gary, Dressler, Alan, Faber, S. M., Filippenko, Alexei V., Green, Richard, Grillmair, Carl, Ho, Luis C., Kormendy, John, Lauer, Tod R., Magorrian, John, Pinkney, Jason, Richstone, Douglas·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Observations of nearby galaxies reveal a strong correlation between the mass of the central dark object M BH and the velocity dispersion σ of the host galaxy, of the form log( M BH / M ☉ ) = α + β log(σ/σ 0 ); however, published estimates of the slope β span a wide range (3.75-5.3). Merritt & Ferrarese have argued that low slopes (≲4) arise because of neglect of random measurement errors in the dispersions and an incorrect choice for the dispersion of the Milky Way Galaxy. We show that these explanations and several others account for at most a small part of the slope range. Instead, the range of slopes arises mostly because of systematic differences in the velocity dispersions used by different groups for the same galaxies. The origin of these differences remains unclear, but we suggest that one significant component of the difference results from Ferrarese & Merritt's extrapolation of central velocity dispersions to r e /8 ( r e is the effective radius) using an empirical formula. Another component may arise from dispersion-dependent systematic errors in the measurements. A new determination of the slope using 31 galaxies yields β = 4.02 ± 0.32, α = 8.13 ± 0.06 for σ 0 = 200 km s -1 . The M BH -σ relation has an intrinsic dispersion in log M BH that is no larger than 0.25-0.3 dex and may be smaller if observational errors have been underestimated. In an appendix, we present a simple kinematic model for the velocity-dispersion profile of the Galactic bulge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/341002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,617

Metadata

Authors
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Richstone, D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-08
Volume
574
Issue
2
Pages
740-753
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2169224160
Cited by
2,617
References
0
FWCI
66.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341002
The paper
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Richstone, D. (2002). The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.