The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation
Open accessAbstract
Observations of nearby galaxies reveal a strong correlation between the mass of the central dark object M BH and the velocity dispersion σ of the host galaxy, of the form log( M BH / M ☉ ) = α + β log(σ/σ 0 ); however, published estimates of the slope β span a wide range (3.75-5.3). Merritt & Ferrarese have argued that low slopes (≲4) arise because of neglect of random measurement errors in the dispersions and an incorrect choice for the dispersion of the Milky Way Galaxy. We show that these explanations and several others account for at most a small part of the slope range. Instead, the range of slopes arises mostly because of systematic differences in the velocity dispersions used by different groups for the same galaxies. The origin of these differences remains unclear, but we suggest that one significant component of the difference results from Ferrarese & Merritt's extrapolation of central velocity dispersions to r e /8 ( r e is the effective radius) using an empirical formula. Another component may arise from dispersion-dependent systematic errors in the measurements. A new determination of the slope using 31 galaxies yields β = 4.02 ± 0.32, α = 8.13 ± 0.06 for σ 0 = 200 km s -1 . The M BH -σ relation has an intrinsic dispersion in log M BH that is no larger than 0.25-0.3 dex and may be smaller if observational errors have been underestimated. In an appendix, we present a simple kinematic model for the velocity-dispersion profile of the Galactic bulge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Casertano, S., Jones, D. O., Murakami, Y., Anand, G. S., Breuval, L., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b · Cited by 2,380
Self-citationGhez, A. M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N. N., Lu, J. R., Do, T., Dunn, J. K., Matthews, K., Morris, M. R., Yelda, S., Becklin, E. E., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/592738 · Cited by 1,577
Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole
Tchekhovskoy, A., Narayan, R., & McKinney, J. C. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x · Cited by 1,254
The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster
Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 · Cited by 1,236
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Richstone, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 574
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 740-753
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2169224160
- Cited by
- 2,617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341002
- The paper
- Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Richstone, D. (2002). The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.