The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weak Lensing and Cosmology
Open accessAbstract
We explore the dependence of weak lensing phenomena on the background cosmology. We first generalize the relation between P ψ (ω), the angular power spectrum of the distortion, and the power spectrum of density fluctuations to nonflat cosmologies. We then compute P ψ for various illustrative models. A useful cosmological discriminator is the growth of P ψ with source redshift, which is much stronger in low-matter density models and especially in Λ-dominated models. With even crude redshift information (say from broadband colors), it should be possible to constrain the cosmological world model. The amplitude of P ψ (ω) is also quite sensitive to the cosmology, but requires a reliable external normalization for the mass fluctuations. If one normalizes to galaxy clustering, with M / L fixed by small-scale galaxy dynamics, then low-density models predict a much stronger distortion. If, however, one normalizes to large-scale bulk flows, the predicted distortion for sources at redshifts Z s ~ 1-3 is rather insensitive to the background cosmology. The signals predicted here can be detected at a very high level of significance with a photometric survey covering, say, 10 deg 2 , but sparse sampling is needed to avoid large sampling variance. We discuss the factors influencing the design of an optimum survey. Turning to weak lensing by clusters, we find that for high lens redshifts ( Z l ≃ 1) the critical density is substantially reduced in Λ-models, but that the ratio of the shear or convergence to the velocity dispersions or X-ray temperature of clusters is only very weakly dependent on the cosmology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Gruen, D., Blazek, J., Friedrich, O., Samuroff, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043528 · Cited by 656
Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Wittman, D. M., Tyson, J. A., Kirkman, D., Dell'Antonio, I., & Bernstein, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012001 · Cited by 605
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 498
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-42
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2084028447
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak Lensing and Cosmology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305515
- The paper
- Kaiser, N. (1998). Weak Lensing and Cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.