The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys
Open accessAbstract
Precision measurements of the galaxy power spectrum P ( k ) require a data analysis pipeline that is both fast enough to be computationally feasible and accurate enough to take full advantage of high-quality data. We present a rigorous discussion of different methods of power spectrum estimation, with emphasis on the traditional Fourier method and linear (Karhunen-Loève; KL) and quadratic data compression schemes, showing in what approximations they give the same result. To improve speed, we show how many of the advantages of KL data compression and power spectrum estimation may be achieved with a computationally faster quadratic method. To improve accuracy, we derive analytic expressions for handling the integral constraint, since it is crucial that finite volume effects are accurately corrected for on scales comparable to the depth of the survey. We also show that for the KL and quadratic techniques, multiple constraints can be included via simple matrix operations, thereby rendering the results less sensitive to Galactic extinction and misestimates of the radial selection function. We present a data analysis pipeline that we argue does justice to the increases in both quality and quantity of data that upcoming redshift surveys will provide. It uses three analysis techniques in conjunction: a traditional Fourier approach on small scales, a pixelized quadratic matrix method on large scales, and a pixelized KL eigenmode analysis to probe anisotropic effects such as redshift-space distortions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Self-citationLarge-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Avgoustidis, A., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., et al. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3 · Cited by 1,009
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Hu, W., & Dodelson, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Tegmark, M., Hamilton, A. J. S., Strauss, M. A., Vogeley, M. S., & Szalay, A. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 499
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-576
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2100665666
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305663
- The paper
- Tegmark, M., Hamilton, A. J. S., Strauss, M. A., Vogeley, M. S., & Szalay, A. S. (1998). Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.