Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Double Nucleus and Central Black Hole of M31

Open access
Kormendy, John, Bender, Ralf·1999·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

New spectroscopy of M31 supports Tremaine's model in which both nuclei are parts of a single eccentric disk of stars orbiting the black hole (BH). The kinematics and Hubble Space Telescope photometry are used to measure the offset of the BH from the center of mass. This confirms that the BH mass is ~ 3 × 10 7 M ☉ by a technique that is nearly independent of stellar-dynamical models. We present spectroscopy of the nucleus of M31 obtained with the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and Subarcsecond Imaging Spectrograph. Spectra at the Ca infrared triplet lines (seeing σ * = 0 27) are used to measure the stellar kinematics, and spectra at the Mg I b lines (σ * = 0 31) are used to measure metallicities. We also measure nonparametric line-of-sight velocity distributions (LOSVDs). All spectra confirm the steep rotation and velocity dispersion gradients that imply that M31 contains a 3.3 × 10 7 M ☉ central dark object. At σ * = 0 27, the maximum bulge-subtracted rotation velocity of the nucleus is 233 ± 4 km s -1 on the P2 side, and the maximum velocity dispersion is 287 ± 9 km s -1 . The dispersion peak is displaced by 0 20 ± 0 03 from the velocity center in the direction opposite to P1, confirming a result by Bacon and coworkers. The higher surface brightness nucleus, P1, is colder than the bulge, with σ ≃ 100 km s -1 at r ≃ 1''. Cold light from P1 contributes at the velocity center; this explains part of the σ( r ) asymmetry. The nucleus is cold at r ≳ 1'' on both sides of the center. Our results are used to test Tremaine's model in which the double nucleus is a single eccentric disk of stars orbiting the BH. (1) The model predicts that the velocity center of the nucleus is displaced by 0 2 from P2 toward P1. Our observations show a displacement of 0 08 ± 0 01 before bulge subtraction and 0 10 ± 0 01 after bulge subtraction. (2) The model predicts a minimum σ ≃ 135 km s -1 at P1. We observe σ = 123 ± 2 km s -1 . Observations (1) and (2) may be reconciled with the model if its parameters are tweaked so that the orbital eccentricity is made larger and the orientation of the orbits is made to point more nearly at us. (3) The model rotation curve is asymmetric; at perfect resolution, V is 60 km s -1 higher on the P2 side than on the P1 side. At σ * = 0 27, we observe an asymmetry of 54 ± 4 km s -1 after bulge subtraction. We regard this as confirmation of the model's essential idea that stellar orbits are eccentric and coherently aligned. (4) The model predicts that P1 and P2 should have the same stellar population. We confirm this: P1 is more similar to P2 than it is to the bulge or to a globular cluster or to M32. This makes it unlikely that P1 consists of accreted stars. (5) Our observation that there is cold light on both sides of the center implies, if the nucleus is an eccentric disk, that some stars have escaped from the P1-P2 alignment and have phase-mixed around the galaxy's center. The dispersion peak coincides with a cluster of ultraviolet-bright stars seen in Hubble Space Telescope images. We propose that the BH is in this cluster. Its center is displaced by 0 068 ± 0 010 from the bulge center. If we put a 3.3 × 10 7 M ☉ dark object in the UV cluster and adopt the dynamically determined mass-to-light ratio of the stars, then the center of mass (COM) of the bulge, nucleus, and dark object coincides with the bulge center to within 0 017 ± 0 016. The COM also agrees with the velocity center of the bulge and outer nucleus. Therefore, the asymmetry of the stars in the double nucleus supports our suggestion that the BH is in the UV cluster. If the stars have a normal mass-to-light ratio, then the location of the COM also confirms the mass of the BH, largely independent of dynamical models. Tremaine's model implies that any dark cluster alternative to a BH is less than 0 13 ± 0 03 = 0.49 pc in radius. The observed mass-to-light ratio is M / L V ≃ 300 in a cylinder of radius r = 0 13 and M / L V ≃ 2200 in a sphere of radius r = 0 13. This is much larger than previous measurements of M / L V . This result and the COM argument greatly strengthen the detection of a central dark object in M31.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/307665

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Kormendy, J., & Bender, R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1999-09-10
Volume
522
Issue
2
Pages
772-792
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1965002622
Cited by
184
References
2
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Double Nucleus and Central Black Hole of M31. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307665
The paper
Kormendy, J., & Bender, R. (1999). The Double Nucleus and Central Black Hole of M31. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.