The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Star Formation in the Orion Nebula Cluster
Open accessAbstract
We study the record of star formation activity within the dense cluster associated with the Orion Nebula. The bolometric luminosity function of 900 visible members is well matched by a simplified theoretical model for cluster formation. This model assumes that stars are produced at a constant rate and distributed according to the field-star initial mass function. Our best-fit age for the system, within this framework, is 2 × 10 6 yr. To undertake a more detailed analysis, we present a new set of theoretical pre-main-sequence tracks. These cover all masses from 0.1 to 6.0 M ☉ , and start from a realistic stellar birthline. The tracks end along a zero-age main-sequence that is in excellent agreement with the empirical one. As a further aid to cluster studies, we offer an heuristic procedure for the correction of pre-main-sequence luminosities and ages to account for the effects of unresolved binary companions. The Orion Nebula stars fall neatly between our birthline and zero-age main-sequence in the H-R diagram. All those more massive than about 8 M ☉ lie close to the main sequence, as also predicted by theory. After accounting for the finite sensitivity of the underlying observations, we confirm that the population between 0.4 and 6.0 M ☉ roughly follows a standard initial mass function. We see no evidence for a turnover at lower masses. We next use our tracks to compile stellar ages, also between 0.4 and 6.0 M ☉ . Our age histogram reveals that star formation began at a low level some 10 7 yr ago and has gradually accelerated to the present epoch. The period of most active formation is indeed confined to a few × 10 6 yr, and has recently ended with gas dispersal from the Trapezium. We argue that the acceleration in stellar births, which extends over a wide range in mass, reflects the gravitational contraction of the parent cloud spawning this cluster.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low-temperature Rosseland opacities
Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175039 · Cited by 1,161
Cited by
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence
Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.125 · Cited by 1,761
Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. (2002) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 · Cited by 656
Slow Star Formation in Dense Gas: Evidence and Implications
Krumholz, M. R., & Tan, J. C. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/509101 · Cited by 629
Soderblom, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130806 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Palla, F., & Stahler, S. W.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1999-11-10
- Volume
- 525
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 772-783
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2071966587
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star Formation in the Orion Nebula Cluster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307928
- The paper
- Palla, F., & Stahler, S. W. (1999). Star Formation in the Orion Nebula Cluster. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.