Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 656

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages

Open access
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H.·2002·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We analyse pre-Main Sequence evolutionary tracks for low mass stars with masses based on the Baraffe et al. ([CITE]) input physics. We also extend the recent Chabrier et al. (2000) evolutionary models based on dusty atmosphere to young brown dwarfs down to one mass of Jupiter. We analyse current theoretical uncertainties due to molecular line lists, convection and initial conditions. Simple tests on initial conditions show the high uncertainties of models at ages 1 Myr. We find a significant sensitivity of atmosphere profiles to the treatment of convection at low gravity and K, whereas it vanishes as gravity increases. This effect adds another source of uncertainty on evolutionary tracks at very early phases. We show that at low surface gravity () the common picture of vertical Hayashi lines with constant Teff is oversimplified. The effect of a variation of initial deuterium abundance is studied. We compare our models with evolutionary tracks available in the literature and discuss the main differences. We finally analyse to what extent current observations of young systems provide a good test for pre-Main Sequence tracks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20011638

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Baraffe, 1997, A&A, 327, 1054
  2. Baraffe, 1998, A&A, 337, 403
  3. Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2001, From darkness to light: origin and evolution of young stellar clusters, ASP Conf. Ser. 243 (Cargese 2000) [astro-ph/0007157] · arXiv
  4. Chabrier, 1997, A&A, 327, 1039
  5. Comerón, 2000, A&A, 359, 269
  6. Covino, 2000, A&A, 361, L49
  7. Dutrey, 1994, A&A, 286, 149
  8. Guilloteau, 1999, A&A, 348, 570
  9. Hartmann, L. 2000, in Proc. of 33rd ESLAB Symp., Star formation from the small to the large scale, ed. F. Favata, A. A. Kaas, & A. Wilson, ESA SP-445
  10. Hayashi, 1961, PASJ, 13, 450
  11. Ludwig, 1999, A&A, 346, 111
  12. Nordlund, 1999, ASP Conf. Ser., 173, 91
  13. O'Meara, 2001, AAS, 197, 5604
  14. Perrin, 1998, A&A, 331, 619
  15. Siess, 2000, A&A, 358, 593
  16. Zapatero Osorio, 1999, ApJ, 524, L115, 10.1086/312317 · doi:10.1086/312317

Cited by

See all 656

Metadata

Authors
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2002-02
Volume
382
Issue
2
Pages
563-572
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2055802842
Cited by
656
References
40
FWCI
24.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20011638
The paper
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. (2002). Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20011638

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.