Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XXVI. The Calibration of Population II Secondary Distance Indicators and the Value of the Hubble Constant

Open access
Ferrarese, Laura, Mould, Jeremy R., Kennicutt, Jr., Robert C., Huchra, John, Ford, Holland C., Freedman, Wendy L., Stetson, Peter B., Madore, Barry F., Sakai, Shoko, Gibson, Brad K., Graham, John A., Hughes, Shaun M., Illingworth, Garth D., Kelson, Daniel D., Macri, Lucas, Sebo, Kim, Silbermann, N. A.·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

A Cepheid-based calibration is derived for four distance indicators that utilize stars in old stellar populations: the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF), the globular cluster luminosity function (GCLF), and the surface brightness fluctuation method (SBF). The calibration is largely based on the Cepheid distances to 18 spiral galaxies within cz = 1500 km s -1 obtained as part of the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale, but relies also on Cepheid distances from separate HST and ground-based efforts. The newly derived calibration of the SBF method is applied to obtain distances to four Abell clusters in the velocity range 3800-5000 km s -1 . Combined with cluster velocities corrected for a cosmological flow model, these distances imply a value of the Hubble constant of H 0 = 69 ± 4 (random) ± 6 (systematic) km s -1 Mpc -1 . This result assumes that the Cepheid PL relation is independent of the metallicity of the variable stars; adopting a metallicity correction as in Kennicutt et al. would produce a 5% ± 3% decrease in H 0 . Finally, the newly derived calibration allows us to investigate systematics in the Cepheid, PNLF, SBF, GCLF, and TRGB distance scales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/308309

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Ferrarese, L., Mould, J. R., Kennicutt, Jr., Huchra, J., Ford, H. C., Freedman, W. L., Stetson, P. B., Madore, B. F., Sakai, S., Gibson, B. K., Graham, J. A., Hughes, S. M., Illingworth, G. D., Kelson, D. D., Macri, L., Sebo, K., & Silbermann, N. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-02
Volume
529
Issue
2
Pages
745-767
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1511001278
Cited by
272
References
1
FWCI
25.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XXVI. The Calibration of Population II Secondary Distance Indicators and the Value of the Hubble Constant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308309
The paper
Ferrarese, L., Mould, J. R., Kennicutt, Jr., Huchra, J., Ford, H. C., Freedman, W. L., Stetson, P. B., Madore, B. F., Sakai, S., Gibson, B. K., Graham, J. A., Hughes, S. M., Illingworth, G. D., Kelson, D. D., Macri, L., Sebo, K., & Silbermann, N. A. (2000). The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XXVI. The Calibration of Population II Secondary Distance Indicators and the Value of the Hubble Constant. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.