The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmic Concordance and Quintessence
Open accessAbstract
We present a comprehensive study of the observational constraints on spatially flat cosmological models containing a mixture of matter and quintessence—a time-varying, spatially inhomogeneous component of the energy density of the universe with negative pressure. Our study also includes the limiting case of a cosmological constant. We classify the observational constraints by redshift: low-redshift constraints include the Hubble parameter, baryon fraction, cluster abundance, the age of the universe, bulk velocity and the shape of the mass power spectrum; intermediate-redshift constraints are due to probes of the redshift-luminosity distance based on Type Ia supernovae, gravitational lensing, the Lyα forest, and the evolution of large-scale structure; high-redshift constraints are based on measurements of the cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropy. Mindful of systematic errors, we adopt a conservative approach in applying these observational constraints. We determine that the range of quintessence models in which the ratio of the matter density to the critical density is 0.2 ≲ Ω m ≲ 0.5, and the effective, density-averaged equation of state is -1 ≤ w ≲ -0.2, is consistent with the most reliable, current low-redshift and microwave background observations at the 2 σ level. Factoring in the constraint due to the recent measurements of Type Ia supernovae, the range for the equation of state is reduced to -1 ≤ w ≲ -0.4, where this range represents models consistent with each observational constraint at the 2 σ level or better (concordance analysis). A combined maximum likelihood analysis suggests a smaller range, -1 ≤ w ≲ -0.6. We find that the best-fit and best-motivated quintessence models lie near Ω m ≈ 0.33, h ≈ 0.65, and spectral index n s = 1, with an effective equation of state w ≈ -0.65 for "tracker" quintessence and w = -1 for "creeper" quintessence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310 · cited 3×
“…around w\ [1, or ", but allows such diverse behavior as However, thewD [13.case w\ 0, which can result from the scaling exponential potential (Ratra & Peebles 1988 ; Peebles & Ratra 1988), is clearly in contradiction with observation : the required) mby the X-ray cluster abundance constraint…”
BackgroundCosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State
Caldwell, R. R., Dave, R., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 · Cited by 3,694
Self-citationThe evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter
Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1985) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/163168 · Cited by 3,391
Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant
Zlatev, I., Wang, L., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.896 · Cited by 2,674
Self-citationA Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Seljak, U., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177793 · Cited by 2,019
Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological 'constant'
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (1988) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/185100 · Cited by 1,720
Cosmological tracking solutions
Steinhardt, P. J., Wang, L., & Zlatev, I. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123504 · Cited by 1,538
Self-citation
Cited by
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
Carroll, S. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1 · Cited by 2,650
Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with w < − 1 Causes a Cosmic Doomsday
Caldwell, R. R., Kamionkowski, M., & Weinberg, N. N. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.071301 · Cited by 2,258
Self-citationBeyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Caldwell, R. R., Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-02-10
- Volume
- 530
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-35
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2055532382
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 47.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmic Concordance and Quintessence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308331
- The paper
- Wang, L., Caldwell, R. R., Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J. (2000). Cosmic Concordance and Quintessence. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.