The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ray‐tracing Simulations of Weak Lensing by Large‐Scale Structure
Open accessAbstract
We investigate weak lensing by large-scale structure using ray tracing through N -body simulations. Photon trajectories are followed through high-resolution simulations of structure formation to make simulated maps of shear and convergence on the sky. Tests with varying numerical parameters are used to calibrate the accuracy of computed lensing statistics on angular scales from ~1' to a few degrees. Various aspects of the weak-lensing approximation are also tested. We show that the nonscalar component of the shear generated by the multiple deflections is small. For fields a few degrees on a side, the shear power spectrum is almost entirely in the nonlinear regime and agrees well with nonlinear analytical predictions. Sampling fluctuations in power-spectrum estimates are investigated by comparing several ray-tracing realizations of a given model. For survey areas smaller than 1° on a side, the main source of scatter is nonlinear coupling to modes larger than the survey. We develop a method that uses this effect to estimate Ω m from the scatter in power-spectrum estimates for subregions of a larger survey. We show that the power spectrum can be measured accurately on scales corresponding to 1-10 h -1 Mpc with realistic number densities of source galaxies with large intrinsic ellipticities. Non-Gaussian features in the one-point distribution function of the weak-lensing convergence (reconstructed from the shear) are also sensitive to Ω m . We suggest several techniques for estimating Ω m in the presence of noise and compare their statistical power, robustness, and simplicity. With realistic number densities of source galaxies, Ω m can be determined to within 0.1-0.2 from a deep survey of several square degrees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
The skewness of the aperture mass statistic
Jarvis, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07926.x · Cited by 326
Self-citationCosmology with weak lensing surveys
MUNSHI, D., VALAGEAS, P., VANWAERBEKE, L., & HEAVENS, A. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.02.003 · Cited by 299
Weak‐Lensing Surveys and the Intrinsic Correlation of Galaxy Ellipticities
Croft, R. A. C., & Metzler, C. A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/317856 · Cited by 260
Denoising weak lensing mass maps with deep learning
Shirasaki, M., Yoshida, N., & Ikeda, S. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043527 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, B., Seljak, U., & White, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-02-20
- Volume
- 530
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 547-577
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2050130030
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ray‐tracing Simulations of Weak Lensing by Large‐Scale Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308384
- The paper
- Jain, B., Seljak, U., & White, S. (2000). Ray‐tracing Simulations of Weak Lensing by Large‐Scale Structure. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.