The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models
Open accessAbstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are believed to be produced when fast-moving ejecta from some central source collides with slower moving, but relativistic, shells that were ejected at an earlier time. In this so-called internal shock scenario we expect some fraction of the energy of the burst to be carried by slow-moving shells that were ejected at late times. These slow shells collide with faster moving outer shells when the outer shells have slowed down as a result of sweeping up material from the interstellar medium. This gives rise to a forward shock that moves into the outer shell, producing a bump in the afterglow light curve of the amplitude roughly proportional to the ratio of the energy in the inner and the outer shells. In addition, a reverse shock propagates in the inner shell and produces emission at a characteristic frequency that is typically much smaller than the peak of the emission from the outer shell by a factor of ~7γ ( E 2 / E 1 ) 1.1 , and the observed flux at this frequency from the reverse shock is larger compared to the flux from the outer shell by a factor of ~8(γ 0 c E 2 / E 1 ) 5/3 ; where γ 0 c is the bulk Lorentz factor of the outer shell at the time of collision, and E 1 and E 2 are the total energy in the outer and the inner shells, respectively. The Lorentz factor is related to the observer time as ~5( t /day) 3/8 . The shell collision could produce initial temporal variability in the early afterglow signal. The lack of significant deviation from a power-law decline of the optical afterglow from half a dozen bursts suggests that E 2 / E 1 is small. Future multiwavelength observations should be able to either detect bumps in the light curve corresponding to both the forward and the reverse shocks or further constrain the late time release of energy in ejecta with a small Lorentz factor, which is expected generically in the internal shock models for the GRBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationEvidence for a Canonical Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data
Nousek, J. A., Kouveliotou, C., Grupe, D., Page, K. L., Granot, J., Ramirez‐Ruiz, E., Patel, S. K., Burrows, D. N., Mangano, V., Barthelmy, S., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500724 · Cited by 886
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
A complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, P., & Piran, T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-03-20
- Volume
- 532
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 286-293
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W3121427245
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308537
- The paper
- Kumar, P., & Piran, T. (2000). Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.