Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models

Open access
Kumar, Pawan, Piran, Tsvi·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are believed to be produced when fast-moving ejecta from some central source collides with slower moving, but relativistic, shells that were ejected at an earlier time. In this so-called internal shock scenario we expect some fraction of the energy of the burst to be carried by slow-moving shells that were ejected at late times. These slow shells collide with faster moving outer shells when the outer shells have slowed down as a result of sweeping up material from the interstellar medium. This gives rise to a forward shock that moves into the outer shell, producing a bump in the afterglow light curve of the amplitude roughly proportional to the ratio of the energy in the inner and the outer shells. In addition, a reverse shock propagates in the inner shell and produces emission at a characteristic frequency that is typically much smaller than the peak of the emission from the outer shell by a factor of ~7γ ( E 2 / E 1 ) 1.1 , and the observed flux at this frequency from the reverse shock is larger compared to the flux from the outer shell by a factor of ~8(γ 0 c E 2 / E 1 ) 5/3 ; where γ 0 c is the bulk Lorentz factor of the outer shell at the time of collision, and E 1 and E 2 are the total energy in the outer and the inner shells, respectively. The Lorentz factor is related to the observer time as ~5( t /day) 3/8 . The shell collision could produce initial temporal variability in the early afterglow signal. The lack of significant deviation from a power-law decline of the optical afterglow from half a dozen bursts suggests that E 2 / E 1 is small. Future multiwavelength observations should be able to either detect bumps in the light curve corresponding to both the forward and the reverse shocks or further constrain the late time release of energy in ejecta with a small Lorentz factor, which is expected generically in the internal shock models for the GRBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/308537

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, P., & Piran, T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-03-20
Volume
532
Issue
1
Pages
286-293
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3121427245
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308537
The paper
Kumar, P., & Piran, T. (2000). Some Observational Consequences of Gamma‐Ray Burst Shock Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.