Cited by 82Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The Isotopic Abundances of Magnesium in Stars

Open access
Gay, Pamela L., Lambert, David L.·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Isotopic abundance ratios 24 Mg : 25 Mg : 26 Mg are derived for 20 stars from high-resolution spectra of the MgH A-X 0-0 band at 5140 Å. With the exception of the weak G-band giant HR 1299, the stars are dwarfs that sample the metallicity range -1.8 < [Fe/H] < 0.0. The abundance of 25 Mg and 26 Mg relative to the dominant isotope 24 Mg decreases with decreasing [Fe/H] in fair accord with predictions from a recent model of Galactic chemical evolution in which the Mg isotopes are synthesized by massive stars. Several stars appear especially enriched in the heavier Mg isotopes, suggesting contamination by material from the envelopes of intermediate-mass asymptotic giant branch stars.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/308653

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fenner et al. (2003) found that the contribution of AGB stars was essential to explain the Mg isotopic ratios observed in cool evolved field stars.

    “Fenner et al. (2003) found that the contribution of AGB stars was essential to explain the Mg isotopic ratios observed in cool evolved field stars (Gay &amp; Lambert 2000; Yong et al. 2003b).”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Gay & Lambert 2000

    Section 4.2 and the Concluding Remarks report Mg-isotope enrichment in particular peculiar stars and attribute it to ejecta from intermediate-mass AGB stars. But the paper does not establish that AGB contributions were essential to explain the ratios in cool evolved field stars generally, nor can this 2000 paper report Fenner et al.’s 2003 finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mg isotopic ratios can be obtained using the MgH line.

    “It is possible to obtain isotopic ratios for Mg by using the MgH line”
  • Gay and Lambert (2000) showed, on the basis of molecular absorption lines of MgH, that r_Mg generally decreases with smaller metallicity.

    “While no direct measurement of r Mg ¼ ð 26 Mg þ 25 MgÞ= 24 Mg in QSO absorber was feasible for a long time due to the small separation of the isotopic absorption lines, it was shown (Gay and Lambert 2000), on the basis of molecular absorption lines of MgH that r Mg generally decreases with smaller metallicity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Day, R. W. 1980, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Texas
  2. Morell, O. 1994, Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala Univ.
  3. Ka llander, Nissen, P. E., E., & Schuster, W. J. 1997, in Proc. ESA Hipparcos HÔg, Symp. (ESA SP-402 ; Noordwijk : ESA), 225
  4. Norris, J. E. 1999, preprint
  5. Sneden, C. 1973, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Texas
  6. Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1982, in Essays in Nuclear Astrophysics, ed. C. A. Barnes, D. D. Clayton, & D. N. Schramm (Cambridge : Cam- bridge Univ. Press), 377 ÈÈÈ. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gay, P. L., & Lambert, D. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-04-10
Volume
533
Issue
1
Pages
260-270
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2011204465
Cited by
82
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9618414)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
magnesium isotopes, isotope abundance ratios, stellar abundances, metallicity dependence, galactic chemical evolution, massive star nucleosynthesis, asymptotic giant branch stars, dwarf stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review