The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Photometric redshifts are quickly becoming an essential tool of observational cosmology, although their utilization is somewhat hindered by certain shortcomings of the existing methods, e.g., the unreliability of maximum-likelihood techniques or the limited application range of the "training-set" approach. The application of Bayesian inference to the problem of photometric redshift estimation effectively overcomes most of these problems. The use of prior probabilities and Bayesian marginalization facilitates the inclusion of relevant knowledge, such as the expected shape of the redshift distributions and the galaxy type fractions, which can be readily obtained from existing surveys but are often ignored by other methods. If this previous information is lacking or insufficient—for instance, because of the unprecedented depth of the observations—the corresponding prior distributions can be calibrated using even the data sample for which the photometric redshifts are being obtained. An important advantage of Bayesian statistics is that the accuracy of the redshift estimation can be characterized in a way that has no equivalents in other statistical approaches, enabling the selection of galaxy samples with extremely reliable photometric redshifts. In this way, it is possible to determine the properties of individual galaxies more accurately, and simultaneously estimate the statistical properties of a sample in an optimal fashion. Moreover, the Bayesian formalism described here can be easily generalized to deal with a wide range of problems that make use of photometric redshifts. There is excellent agreement between the ≈130 Hubble Deep Field North (HDF-N) spectroscopic redshifts and the predictions of the method, with a rms error of Δ z ≈ 0.06(1 + z spec ) up to z < 6 and no outliers nor systematic biases. It should be remarked that since these results have not been reached following a training-set procedure, the above value of Δ z should be a fair estimate of the expected accuracy for any similar sample. The method is further tested by estimating redshifts in the HDF-N but restricting the color information to the UBVI filters; the results are shown to be significantly more reliable than those obtained with maximum-likelihood techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A HIGHLY CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE STAR-FORMING “MAIN SEQUENCE” FROM z ∼ 0-6
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 · Cited by 1,646
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
Heymans, C., Grocutt, E., Heavens, A., Kilbinger, M., Kitching, T. D., Simpson, F., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt601 · Cited by 649
Pérez‐González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., Villar, V., Barro, G., Blaylock, M., Egami, E., Gallego, J., Gil de Paz, A., Pascual, S., Zamorano, J., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/523690 · Cited by 601
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Benitez, N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-06-20
- Volume
- 536
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 571-583
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2093437356
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/308947
- The paper
- Benitez, N. (2000). Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/308947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.