The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expected Number and Flux Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows with High Redshifts
Open accessAbstract
If gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) occur at high redshifts, then their bright afterglow emission can be used to probe the ionization and metal enrichment histories of the intervening intergalactic medium during the epoch of reionization. In contrast to other sources, such as galaxies or quasars, which fade rapidly with increasing redshift, the observed infrared flux from a GRB afterglow at a fixed observed age is only a weak function of its redshift. This results from a combination of the spectral slope of GRB afterglows and the time stretching of their evolution in the observer's frame. Assuming that the GRB rate is proportional to the star formation rate and that the characteristic energy output of GRBs is ~10 52 ergs, we predict that there are always ~15 GRBs from redshifts z ≳ 5 across the sky that are brighter than ~100 nJy at an observed wavelength of ~2 μm. The infrared spectrum of these sources could be taken with the future Next Generation Space Telescope as a follow-up to early X-ray localization with the Swift satellite.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I. Theoretical discussion
Taylor, G. I. (1950) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1950.0049 · Cited by 1,378
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
The Formation of the First Star in the Universe
Abel, T., Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063991 · Cited by 1,448
Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034 · Cited by 957
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reionization
Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., & Keating, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092514 · Cited by 788
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciardi, B., & Loeb, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-09-10
- Volume
- 540
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 687-696
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2060035447
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expected Number and Flux Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows with High Redshifts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309384
- The paper
- Ciardi, B., & Loeb, A. (2000). Expected Number and Flux Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows with High Redshifts. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.