Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Peculiar Type II Supernova 1997D: A Case for a Very Low [TSUP]56[/TSUP]N[CLC]i[/CLC] Mass

Open access
Turatto, M., Mazzali, P. A., Young, T. R., Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., Danziger, I. J., de Mello, D. F., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., Clocchiatti, A., Piemonte, A., Leibundgut, B., Covarrubias, R., Maza, J., Sollerman, J.·1998·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

SN 1997D in NGC 1536 is possibly the least luminous and energetic Type II supernova discovered to date. The entire light curve is subluminous, never reaching M V =-14.65. The radioactive tail follows the 56 Co decay slope. In the case of a nearly complete trapping of the γ-rays, the 56 Ni mass derived from the tail brightness is extremely small, ~0.002 M ☉ . At discovery, the spectra showed a red continuum and line velocities on the order of 1000 km s −1 . The luminosity and the photospheric expansion velocity suggest that the explosion occurred about 50 days before discovery and that a plateau probably followed. Model light curves and spectra of the explosion of a 26 M ☉ star successfully fitted the observations. Low-mass models are inconsistent with the observations. The radius of the progenitor, constrained by the prediscovery upper limits, is R 0 ≲ 300 R ☉ . A low explosion energy of ~4 × 10 50 ergs is then required in the modeling. The strong Ba II lines in the photospheric spectra are reproduced with a solar abundance and low T eff . A scenario in which the low 56 Ni mass observed in SN 1997D is due to fallback of material onto the collapsed remnant of the explosion of a 25-40 M ☉ star appears to be favored over the case of the explosion of an 8-10 M ☉ star with low 56 Ni production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/311324

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Turatto, M., Mazzali, P. A., Young, T. R., Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., Danziger, I. J., de Mello, D. F., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., Clocchiatti, A., Piemonte, A., Leibundgut, B., Covarrubias, R., Maza, J., & Sollerman, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1998-05-10
Volume
498
Issue
2
Pages
L129-L133
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1710955822
Cited by
197
References
1
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Peculiar Type II Supernova 1997D: A Case for a Very Low [TSUP]56[/TSUP]N[CLC]i[/CLC] Mass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/311324
The paper
Turatto, M., Mazzali, P. A., Young, T. R., Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., Danziger, I. J., de Mello, D. F., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., Clocchiatti, A., Piemonte, A., Leibundgut, B., Covarrubias, R., Maza, J., & Sollerman, J. (1998). The Peculiar Type II Supernova 1997D: A Case for a Very Low [TSUP]56[/TSUP]N[CLC]i[/CLC] Mass. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/311324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.