The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tidal Streams as Probes of the Galactic Potential
Open accessAbstract
We explore the use of tidal streams from Galactic satellites for recovering the potential of the Milky Way. Our study is motivated both by the discovery of the first lengthy stellar stream in the halo (Irwin & Totten) and by the prospect of measuring proper motions of stars brighter than 20th magnitude in such a stream with an accuracy of ~4 μas yr -1 , as will be possible with the Space Interferometry Mission ( SIM ). We assume that the heliocentric radial velocities of these stars can be determined from supporting ground-based spectroscopic surveys and that the mass and phase-space coordinates of the Galactic satellite with which they are associated will also be known to SIM accuracy. Using the results from numerical simulations as trial data sets, we find that, if we assume the correct form for the Galactic potential, we can predict the distances to the stars as a consequence of the narrow distribution of energy expected along the streams. We develop an algorithm to evaluate the accuracy of any adopted potential by requiring that the satellite and stars recombine within a Galactic lifetime when their current phase-space coordinates are integrated backward. When applied to a four-dimensional grid of triaxial logarithmic potentials, with varying circular velocities, axis ratios, and orientation of the major axis in the disk plane, the algorithm can recover the parameters used for the Milky Way in a simulated data set to within a few percent using only 100 stars in a tidal stream.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tracing Galaxy Formation with Stellar Halos. I. Methods
Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/497422 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationThe Ghost of Sagittarius and Lumps in the Halo of the Milky Way
Newberg, H. J., Yanny, B., Rockosi, C., Grebel, E. K., Rix, H., Brinkmann, J., Csabai, I., Hennessy, G., Hindsley, R. B., Ibata, R., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/338983 · Cited by 760
LAMOST Experiment for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (LEGUE) — The survey's science plan
Deng, L.-C., Newberg, H. J., Liu, C., Carlin, J. L., Beers, T. C., Chen, L., Chen, Y.-Q., Christlieb, N., Grillmair, C. J., Guhathakurta, P., et al. (2012) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/7/003 · Cited by 554
The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream
Erkal, D., Belokurov, V, Laporte, C. F. P., Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., Grillmair, C. J., Kallivayalil, N., Price-Whelan, A. M., Evans, N. W., Hawkins, K., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1371 · Cited by 357
Is the SMC Bound to the LMC? The Hubble Space Telescope Proper Motion of the SMC
Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R. P., & Alcock, C. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/508014 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, K. V., Zhao, H., Spergel, D. N., & Hernquist, L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1999-02-20
- Volume
- 512
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L109-L112
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998483652
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tidal Streams as Probes of the Galactic Potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/311876
- The paper
- Johnston, K. V., Zhao, H., Spergel, D. N., & Hernquist, L. (1999). Tidal Streams as Probes of the Galactic Potential. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/311876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.